The organization and funding for the original Vietnam war protests certainly did come from the communists, regardless of your view of the merits of such protests. Most of us who were military personnel during the war - whether we served in Vietnam or not - were well aware that the war was being mishandled, but that was "political" rather than tactical. And, in case you don't remember, Cambodia and Laos also fell to communist insurgents and literally millions died as a result (remember Pol Pot?). The Thais are still fighting a communist-inspired insurgency. "Domino Effect." The same sorts of issues drove the Iraq and Afghan conflicts; when casualties started to mount in Iraq, the Democrats sought to sabotage the war effort and certainly encouraged anti-Bush opposition to the war. Notice that once Barak Obama took office, the daily casualty counts disappeared, and when he decided to commit more troops to Afghanistan ala the "Bush Surge" in Iraq, nary a murmur seeped out of the national news media. Doesn't matter if a conflict is "justified" or "unjustified" (usually depends upon whether you win or not) no country is going to win a war unless the government and the people stand behind the military. And when the military forces are hamstrung by Rules Of Engagement which restrict their ability to defeat the enemy and which compromise their safety for no tactical and strategic purpose, there will be no possibility of victory. George Bush warned us that we were in a "generational war" and it seems that we aren't capable of visualizing or conducting such a war.
I give credit to the good Senator Charlie Wilson from Texas for breaking the Soviets backs personally. Yes I know exactly who and what Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge did. Fighting proxy wars to stop communism was absurd at best. Honestly the only two proxy wars we conducted successfully were the war in Korea, and the funding of the Mujahideen. As long as the principle of MAD (mutually assured destruction) was in place the cold war would have stayed cold. The way the Soviet Union went about conducting itself economically was unsustainable at best and disastrous at worst. The US used the Soviet Union as the bogey man for decades it was sad. I know exactly what the domino effect was as well and to put it frankly why would it matter to the US economically or politically if a bunch of backwater third world Asian countries "fell" into Communism.
Look at every "communist" country left in the world they are only communist in make (with the exception of North Korea those people are crazy). Communism is not nor will it ever be a sustainable form of government and I bet my last dollar the US government has known that all along. The old cold war maxim of giving thirld world countries democracy and freedom was insane, the people of those countries have to want it for themselves, not have it forced upon them. If you need an example look at Iraq, or better yet and more relevant South Vietnam.