I feel neither strongly or weakly about reports that Snopes has been editing their pages on this topic. It's just a FACT. No emotional connection here. The reason I suggested one can google it is because regardless of how many times I provide a link to a 'source', internet warriors often times cut down that link/source so what I moved on from that practice and suggest that an able-bodied keyboardist find one of many hundreds of references to the discussion themselves and that way satisfy their own criteria of which I cannot begin to imagine.
So, I provided ONE link for you to read. And I provided one link that will in-turn provide hundreds of links. I have given you both options. You can accept the one link and just read it, or you can find fault with the one link and use the other link to find a link that will satisfy your own criteria. Or, you can do neither and imply that I am unwilling or unable to argue with you over the aforementioned content.
I don't care about the content.
Either way.
If YOU care about it, you can explore and enlighten yourself. Otherwise don't.
I am unattached to how the whole 'snopes changes content' thing plays out. I was merely pointing out that previous participants in THIS THREAD seem to hold snopes in some high regard, and I merely want to enlighten them that there exist facts to the contrary that might persuade them to question and/or alter their beliefs on the subject matter of snopes in general.
And the whole snopes discussion is a big, fat TANGENT to the discussion here in general.
