Secession.

[Birds Away]

Funny, I was thinking that we were evolving as a society. Whites aren't the majority anymore, cultural diversity is becoming the norm with multi-race individuals being born all the time.

You guys wanting to keep thing "As they were in the glory days" are a dying breed. Societies evolve, people evolve, ranting about the glory days isn't evolving, it's a boat anchor on process.

Why is it that when anyone disagrees with liberalism then they must be a racist? I'm sick of it. It is disingenuous at best.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

Funny, I was thinking that we were evolving as a society. Whites aren't the majority anymore, cultural diversity is becoming the norm with multi-race individuals being born all the time.

You guys wanting to keep thing "As they were in the glory days" are a dying breed. Societies evolve, people evolve, ranting about the glory days isn't evolving, it's a boat anchor on process.

This is so full of fail I don't know where to start. Since others already corrected the minority part I'll address the "evolving" part, there is a process for this in the COTUS, it's called an amendment. Want to change things? Then follow the letter of law that this nation was founded upon, can't get enough support to do it the right way then get out! Don't come into my house for dinner and rearrange the furniture without asking first!

 

[Mad Macs]

Why is it that when anyone disagrees with liberalism then they must be a racist? I'm sick of it. It is disingenuous at best.

Well, are you?

 

[Mad Macs]

This is so full of fail I don't know where to start. Since others already corrected the minority part I'll address the "evolving" part, there is a process for this in the COTUS, it's called an amendment. Want to change things? Then follow the letter of law that this nation was founded upon, can't get enough support to do it the right way then get out! Don't come into my house for dinner and rearrange the furniture without asking first!

please don't think outside your tiny box.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

I missed it at first but I think you meant "progress" not. "Process" and that explains a lot. You think progress means ignoring the rules and doing whatever you want because you have some birth right to do so. Progressivism is a disease that the feeble minded suffer from.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

please don't think outside your tiny box.

I don't need to because the box came equipped with two doors, one a legitimate method of change and the other leads out if you feel stuck inside it please find your way to one of them!

 

[Mad Macs]

I missed it at first but I think you meant "progress" not. "Process" and that explains a lot. You think progress means ignoring the rules and doing whatever you want because you have some birth right to do so. Progressivism is a disease that the feeble minded suffer from.

Yes, I did mean progress.

So, you have a choice:

1) Evolve
2) Don't evolve.

Clinging to ancient thinking "just because you want to" will only make you bitter and angry.

I never said progress was ignoring the rules, but getting your panties in a bunch and threatening to leave the country because you don't like the POTUS is childish and totally Un-American.

 

[Mad Macs]

I don't need to because the box came equipped with two doors, one a legitimate method of change and the other leads out if you feel stuck inside it please find your way to one of them!

So any change in thinking has to come from the COTUS? Interesting. Why do you need a document to show you how to think and act?

 

[ThrottleJockey]

So any change in thinking has to come from the COTUS? Interesting. Why do you need a document to show you how to think and act?

Not even close. You refuse to accept that there is a lawful and legitimate method for change. I can only assume it is due to either plain ignorance, desire for lawlessness, or there is just no support for it or perhaps some sick combination of them brought about by a desire to force your ideals upon others?

 

[Mad Macs]

Not even close. You refuse to accept that there is a lawful and legitimate method for change. I can only assume it is due to either plain ignorance, desire for lawlessness, or there is just no support for it or perhaps some sick combination of them brought about by a desire to force your ideals upon others?

I don't understand your anger and condescending attitude. You're so angry and now you are calling me ignorant? I never once said there wasn't a lawful way to make change happen, I just don't understand why you are so angry and demanding that everything be black and white. Not everything is absolute, there are gray areas everywhere.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Why is it that when anyone disagrees with liberalism then they must be a racist? I'm sick of it. It is disingenuous at best.

Because it works.

 

[Birds Away]

Well, are you?

That is the shallow well of liberalism. I actually do judge a person by the content of their character.

 

[kiddchaos]

You can always move to Sealand.

http://www.sealandgov.org/about

 

[ThrottleJockey]

Let's compare it to a bad marriage. One party is responsible, works, remains faithful, etc while the other won't work, cheats, spends too much time at the bar spends uncontrollably, etc. The first wants a divorce but the second doesn't because his/her abuse of the first is working out great for him/her. Do we allow them dissolution or force them to maintain the partnership empowering the abuser further?

 

[Mad Macs]

That is the shallow well of liberalism. I actually do judge a person by the content of their character.

That must has been somebody else bashing liberals a few pages back. Sorry, they must have logged into your account and posted as you.

 

[Classic]

Total of 675,000 signatures so far. I don't see it as any different than a married couple seeking a divorce over irreconcilable differences.

 

[Mad Macs]

Let's compare it to a bad marriage. One party is responsible, works, remains faithful, etc while the other won't work, cheats, spends too much time at the bar spends uncontrollably, etc. The first wants a divorce but the second doesn't because his/her abuse of the first is working out great for him/her. Do we allow them dissolution or force them to maintain the partnership empowering the abuser further?

Wait, so conservatives are the only hard working people in this country?

 

[Mad Macs]

Total of 675,000 signatures so far. I don't see it as any different than a married couple seeking a divorce over irreconcilable differences.

And as in any marriage, you have the power to leave.

 

[ThrottleJockey]

I don't understand your anger and condescending attitude. You're so angry and now you are calling me ignorant? I never once said there wasn't a lawful way to make change happen, I just don't understand why you are so angry and demanding that everything be black and white. Not everything is absolute, there are gray areas everywhere.

Arguing with idiots is worse than a bullet to the head. I didn't call you ignorant but if that's the excuse you choose, so be it, you'll get no further argument from me!

 

[Mad Macs]

Arguing with idiots is worse than a bullet to the head. I didn't call you ignorant but if that's the excuse you choose, so be it, you'll get no further argument from me!

Actually I quote you here:

"I can only assume it is due to either plain ignorance, desire for lawlessness, or there is just no support for it"

So you did call me ignorant, and now you're calling me an idiot.

Nice.