Jesus and libertarianism are polar opposites.
Just a statement? Or are you going to explain.
Jesus and libertarianism are polar opposites.
Jesus and libertarianism are polar opposites.
Jesus and libertarianism are polar opposites.
I agree with you in most instances, but not in this case.
I think that is a fair statement, but only if we ignore Grace. He sacrificed pretty significantly to provide a remedy. That couldn't be classified as evil.
At some point in everyone's life, we all accept something on faith, without conclusive evidence. Right now you lack conclusive evidence to refute God, and you are staking your immortal soul on your conclusion. I would rather me be wrong and you be right. The consequences are not that bad for me if I'm wrong.
Billions of people have lived and died before you, the vast majority of a different faith.
I'm sure they all thought that they were right.
How strong is your faith, if the reality is that you are just hedging your bets?
The sacrifice was no more than many others had gone through at the time. Crucifixion was a common means of execution. Besides that, popping up refreshed 3 days later sort of negates the whole thing, in my mind.
Considering that the source of both the damnation and the "remedy" are the same, the "sacrifice" rings hollow.
you just need to run out in your boxers or underwear with an American Flag singing the national anthem. It repels JW's really well trust meHonest question:
Do you think there is anyone in Indiana that hasn't heard "the word"?
There are three Christian churches within a half a mile of my house, including my official polling location...radio, television, the Internet: all full of "the word". If I want it, I have no problem gaining access to "the word".
LDS, Jehovah's Witness, and a non-denominational Christian "outreach" ministry have all ignored my CLEARLY POSTED "No Soliciting" sign within the last six weeks...all eager to bring "the word" into my living room, whether I wanted it or not.
I have heard "the word"...as a Hoosier it would appear I have no realistic choice otherwise. Now, please tell me...what on Earth does it take to get Christians to keep "the word" to themselves?
It really isn't based on anything small like that at all. But it's a fair rhetorical device. You're welcome to disagree of course. I'm sure you will understand I disagree with your characterization of the Gospel. You and I have faith in different things.
Yeah but bye bye pensionI believe he will find an assignment in a sympathetic local agency.
Rules are rules. How they're characterised has nothing to do with the outcome, should they turn out to be true. Those of us unable to believe without evidence are a small sacrifice to be made to preserve the rules for everyone else. If Christian doctrine turns out to be true, I'm just one of God's rounding errors.
We all believe things without all the evidence. We are just disagreeing about which ones we choose.
Belief isn't a choice; it's just a response to a set of stimuli. That's like saying water chooses to be wet or snow chooses to be cold.
Belief isn't a choice; it's just a response to a set of stimuli. That's like saying water chooses to be wet or snow chooses to be cold.
Great news. I can throw all my scales, micrometers, and calipers in the trash.
I'm sorry, I just can't shut my brain off like that. To worship something that I can't possibly understand, because a centuries old book tells me to. I suppose that's the essence of faith....to shut up and just believe. If I am wrong in the end, hopefully I will be forgiven for thinking like the flawed creature that I was created to be. I don't hold out much hope for that, though. To create a being with life and emotions....love, laughter, joy and family.....only to throw the soul into a lake of fire for eternity because he was as flawed as you knew he would be....well, that's just plain evil from my point of view.