Because it is my right and my freedom as a property owner to do so.Why do you believe you can sell something to someone and maintain control over it after?
Why are you so adamant that buyers and sellers of property must have it dictated to them how and what they can buy and sell? What about their freedom? I do not want the freedom to restore cars in my driveway or store an RV. Many others do not also, they have the right and freedom to buy where that has been agreed not to happen. Indyblue would not want to live there and he has options of places he can do that.If someone doesn't want someone doing something on the land they own they should not sell it. It's that simple. You get to control what you own, you don't get to control what you don't own. That's the entire point of ownership. If someone wants to buy a piece of land and agree to not raise cattle, that's between them. HOAs are a different animal in how they're created and executed and you know it. I'm done addressing your BS comparisons.
You bring up an interview point, sellers of houses that retain possession of the house after the buyer closes on it and owns it. That too is controlling property they don’t own.Selling a house to someone and both parties agree upon things like when possession transfer occurs makes sense. People should be free to agree upon whatever they want.
Petty by whose definition? There likely are as many definitions as there are people.Selling property and putting petty rules on it which go on in perpetuity is ridiculous.
That is not when the decision is made, it is made when the seller delivers the covenants, restrictions and HOA documents to the buyer. With your career of dealing with people and all the bad that can do are you really surprised folks would take steps to mitigate the bad they can do in a neighborhood? Things that can hurt property values?If given the option at closing, there would be so few people signing on to HOAs that none would exist in pretty short order.
It really is not that hard to change HOA, an amendment is proposed, it is put up to a vote, if passed it is recorded at the county offices. That simple. So why do we never hear about this being attempted since it is so simple? Because not enough care to do it, but I’m supposed to believe at closing they would think different?