I sure hope he taught his kids to have more compassion for others than he is showing to those girls' parents.Tell me do you also walk on water.
I sure hope he taught his kids to have more compassion for others than he is showing to those girls' parents.Tell me do you also walk on water.
Tell me do you also walk on water.
I sure hope he taught his kids to have more compassion for others than he is showing to those girls' parents.
So screw everyone that ever has anything bad to them then, right? I mean, they had it coming.When do we learn from our errors? When do we learn from the errors of others? Never?
How do you know the parents failed to monitor their cellular communication? And what age is appropriate to let kids out on their own? If you chose to keep your kids locked in a cage until they turned 18, that's on you.13 is too young to trust leaving girls on their own to fend for themselves away from home. Much less, with cellular communication that you have failed to monitor.
Summer time around me it's very common to see kids younger than 13 in the park with friends the same age. Nobody thinks twice. Same with walking to school. Or...My point is you say at 13 they aren't trustworthy, but at 15/16 years old they are going to start driving and working.
That is only a 2-3 year span, at what point in that timeframe do you think they should start learning responsibility? I sure don't want to just throw them to the wolves.
Our little park is sometimes full of young teenagers hanging out. They get dropped off, walk, ride bicycles. I don't believe locking down kids and not promoting them to be decision makers is helpful. I think that's how you end up with people who can't function properly.
Edit: I don't think anyone is saying no one is at fault, but in my experience it's usually the person commiting the crime.
That's pretty much where I'm at. Not blaming anyone but the killer, but if there was ever a time a couple of girls this age could wander far away from home on public grounds, it's not today and wasn't 5 years ago either.Wow this thread has taken a slant?
I used to have a 13 year old daughter if she wanted go somewhere she had to answer about 30 questions.
At 16 she had to answer about 10
At 18 she was told to be safe
It's not semantics. THe Monon Trail is an organization. YOu can find its website. There is no, zero, zilch discussion of expanding it to include the entire old Monon railbed. It would be nice if they did, but I see no evidence of it.The trail is not a State project, it is done locally but often with state or federal contributions. The political want to continue its growth, as it is one of the most popular things they do. Many recreational organizations also are working toward that. There is no link to a government document saying how and when they will continue it.
The existing trail was built by communities sections at a time. There have been communities that built their trail that did not connect to the Indy trail for years. If it is on the old Monon railway it is a part of an overall Monon Trail in my book.
Please tell me this questioning is is not a semantics game?
How do you know the parents failed to monitor their cellular communication? And what age is appropriate to let kids out on their own?
You have all the answer . . . don't ask us.What age are kids when you stop parenting them?
Are your girls gonna live long enough to be concerned with teenage pregnancy or ODing on fentanyl?You have all the answer . . . don't ask us.
Don't know. My son is 28 and I still parent him to a degree. My daughter is almost 16 and I still parent her. Doesn't mean I don't let them out of my eyesight or lock them in a cage. I raise(raised) them best that I can. That includes allowing a bit of freedom. And yes at 13 (and younger) my daughter went to the local park with friends. My son as well. Hell at 16 my son went several state away to hike in the middle of nowhere, well not quite nowhere but a hell of a lot more isolated than the Monon High Trail.What age are your girls when you stop parenting them?
Well 13 is old enough to get pregnant, so I'd say yes. And what age is required to OD? Considering I know people that started on heroin younger than that, I'd say yes they were old enough.Are your girls gonna live long enough to be concerned with teenage pregnancy or ODing on fentanyl?
These girls didn't.
That's true and very sad, but not necessarily the parents faultAre your girls gonna live long enough to be concerned with teenage pregnancy or ODing on fentanyl?
These girls didn't.
I agree, but the time wasn't 35 years ago as well when I and I think you were teens. I'm asking you a serious question. When was the time? And not just girls, I'm including boys.That's pretty much where I'm at. Not blaming anyone but the killer, but if there was ever a time a couple of girls this age could wander far away from home on public grounds, it's not today and wasn't 5 years ago either.
We have no time machine. It's just a word to the wise.
Who makes decisions for young girls who are not mature enough to make decisions themselves?That's true and very sad, but not necessarily the parents fault