I'm completely fine with nearly everything you said, and I can understand the position and get behind that.
I have trouble with the "He gave a list, I believe it" portion... because I don't think there's enough evidence for anyone to believe anything he's said... but that can just be a difference of opinion between us. I understand that Trump is probably going to do less damage to 2A, on a single-issue level. I think he'd probably do more damage than Clinton with regards to other important issues... but we're not talking about those.
So on the 2A subject, we are probably on a similar level. Like I've said elsewhere... My fight in this Presidential race is done. I don't care about either of these candidates... but when it comes to INGO (a community I usually enjoy participating in with like-minded people)... I think I have a standard or expectation. I really wish the line between reasonable Trump supporters (you) and die-hards was blurrier. I wish we could, all together, have higher standards for the political party we usually align with... and criticize the candidate they choose.
I don't post criticism here to influence anyone to change their vote. Honestly, that just isn't going to happen. Vote who you want, it's your vote, and that's important. I just want to see reasonable and educated criticism of the person that might be our President. I think the die-hard defense and praise is unhealthy, and something that should stay on the Left. I hate to see it, and it makes people angry and difficult to talk to.
