The Cairo speech; undermining of U.S. allies; continued posture of blaming the victim for the crimes of radicals; refusal to acknowledge threats; refusal to acknowledge actual terroristic attacks, even on U.S. soil (Fort Hood became a "workplace violence incident") . . . inter alia.
You can bet your butt that there were a lot more repercussions in the Beirut attacks than made the newsOk, were still stuck on words. Right now, many in the world see us as a bunch of blowhards because we say a lot of words in these instances and we do nothing. Reagan strongly condemned the Lebanese for their attack that killed 241 Americans. What actions did he take to get justice or to send a message about future events? What actions have our last 5 presidents used to prevent these attacks like the Russians have?
ETA: What have the Russians done to gain a higher level of respect to prevent these types of attacks? Do they stand up and give saber rattling speeches? Do they swiftly kill the perpetrators of any such attacks? Or do they glassify a billion people who share the same religion?
You can bet your butt that there were a lot more repercussions in the Beirut attacks than made the news
I'm NOT quite ready to turn it into a glowing parking lot. (just yet anyway).Did we turn the region into glass like many here want? It was already decided by the majority here that Obama was going to do nothing but apologize but now we're reading that we have ships headed that direction? Which is it?
I don't get the facination with speeches. I can get up to a podium and throw down fire and brimstone about what I'm going to do but if it ends at the speech, what's the point?
Ok, were still stuck on words. Right now, many in the world see us as a bunch of blowhards because we say a lot of words in these instances and we do nothing. Reagan strongly condemned the Lebanese for their attack that killed 241 Americans. What actions did he take to get justice or to send a message about future events? What actions have our last 5 presidents used to prevent these attacks like the Russians have?
ETA: What have the Russians done to gain a higher level of respect to prevent these types of attacks? Do they stand up and give saber rattling speeches? Do they swiftly kill the perpetrators of any such attacks? Or do they glassify a billion people who share the same religion?
So what's your idea of proper action to take. I've seen you ask tough questions of those who want some sort of retaliatory action taken, and yet this post implies that words won't do the job. So what do YOU think ought to be done?
Did we turn the region into glass like many here want? It was already decided by the majority here that Obama was going to do nothing but apologize but now we're reading that we have ships headed that direction? Which is it?
I don't get the facination with speeches. I can get up to a podium and throw down fire and brimstone about what I'm going to do but if it ends at the speech, what's the point?
ETA: were the reprecussions that weren't in the news sucessful in preventing future attacks?
I have noticed, whenever hornadylnl joins a thread, it ends up going WAAAAAAAAAAY off the reservation, and becomes a personal thread between 2 - 3 people talking to each other
Its like watching a online chat.
I call it the "LNLEffect."
I don't know the answer, but I sure hope these people don't get killed because of all this.
'This Does Not Represent Us': Moving Photos of Pro-American Rallies in Libya - Politics - The Atlantic Wire
I don't know the answer, but I sure hope these people don't get killed because of all this.
'This Does Not Represent Us': Moving Photos of Pro-American Rallies in Libya - Politics - The Atlantic Wire
Okay, I retract my desire to carpet bomb Benghazi. Let the SEALs and Delta go in, locate the perps, and kill all of them.
Just out of curiosity, do you think that's the way it should always be handled in such instances as an attack on a diplomatic mission?
If the success rate of such teams are what I want to believe they are, sure.
Not all situations would allow for it, but I'm all for maximizing their talents. Return on investment.
Just off the top of my head, I think that's what it takes to make a measured statement that further attacks on our embassies will be punished in a way most guaranteed to bring shame to the perpetrators' families. Sending in sufficient Marines is too blunt an instrument to get the job done. Does that answer your question?
It does, but such ops are very hard to pull off without creating a poopstorm. And the odds of finding the "right" people to kill, slim.
Okay, I retract my desire to carpet bomb Benghazi. Let the SEALs and Delta go in, locate the perps, and kill all of them.