That has been my reference to this for a long time. It is exactly where we are heading.
I wish I could say we don't deserve it but I can't.
That has been my reference to this for a long time. It is exactly where we are heading.
Escape from New York comes to mind.
Can news organizations really be that agenda biased as to cover this drivel...(rhetorical question...)
I don't envy you guys having to deal with that. Oh, and now I have a headache.Welcome to our world. The world of the surreal, where up is down and down is up...aka "ghetto logic". Trying to intervene in disturbances/domestics/etc is challenging at best when you cannot wrap your brain around the logic used to justify such incidents. BTW, I believe our public safety director mentioned on TV that 60% of our shooting victims refuse to cooperate with investigators...then we get an earful that we are not doing anything to catch the ones who shot their boy. When we explain that their boy was not cooperating, we get yelled at that we should be able to figure it out without them...haha.
Is it not equally agenda-biased to suppress the quotes? As long as the information is accurately sourced and factually correct, the media is doing its job.
Trying to strong-arm the media into accepting biases is some strange doo-doo.
What was factually correct about their statements? He was a good boy? Sometimes things happen? It was the officer's fault he was killed? IPD murdered his father? The police were reckless for shooting when there may have been children in the area but it is perfectly acceptable for their family member?
The police are expected to refuse to do their job if it's something some of the members here don't agree with but it's perfectly acceptable for the media to pull this crap. The cameraman should have turned the camera off and walked away after hearing the BS pouring from those mouths.
What was factually correct about their statements? He was a good boy? Sometimes things happen? It was the officer's fault he was killed? IPD murdered his father? The police were reckless for shooting when there may have been children in the area but it is perfectly acceptable for their family member?
The police are expected to refuse to do their job if it's something some of the members here don't agree with but it's perfectly acceptable for the media to pull this crap. The cameraman should have turned the camera off and walked away after hearing the BS pouring from those mouths.
What was factually correct about their statements? He was a good boy? Sometimes things happen? It was the officer's fault he was killed? IPD murdered his father? The police were reckless for shooting when there may have been children in the area but it is perfectly acceptable for their family member?
Those are all in quotation marks, are they not? I am confident that the TV station accurately attributed them to whom they belong (Pam Moornan).
That doesn't endorse her statements or indicate that she is truthful.
Do you get upset when the media publishes words out of a politician's mouth when he is obviously lying? Boycott them for quoting Obama?
“He wasn’t a bad person. His father was killed by IMPD. That is enough to hurt a person and scar him for life,” said Moornan.
One of the officers listed in that 2003 police report is Officer Perry Renn.
It's no secret that you and I have an extremely different view of the world and this country. I'm not surprised you fail to see the inappropriateness of giving these parasites a voice and publishing anyone's attempts at placing blame on the officer or deflecting it from the murderer.
Seems like a stretch, and a coincidence at best. At that time of night, I cant imagine he could know from a distance who he was shooting at to be able to be singling out Renn. After all, at night, they all look the same! White cars, blue uniforms, etc.Davis decided to get even, now he's a murderer. Bad choices seem to run in the Davis family. God Bless Officer Renn.
Well sure we do, but that avoids the issue. There are many, many parasites out there running their mouths. Some of them are out in the streets demanding more subsidies. Some of them wear suits and have nameplates on their desks. Who should we demand the media not cover?
There are lots of distasteful opinions that get published. A sheriff recently blamed terrorism for his inept deputies blowing a hole in a baby. It never dawned on me that the media should be punished for quoting him.
Seems like a stretch, and a coincidence at best. At that time of night, I cant imagine he could know from a distance who he was shooting at to be able to be singling out Renn. After all, at night, they all look the same! White cars, blue uniforms, etc.
Now if we were talking Mayberry USA with a single town marshal, absolutely I could see that. But this almost has to be a coincidence given by current accounts they didnt have a face to face discussion before the lead started flying.