Have you read Life At The Bottom yet? Go read it and it will all make sense to you.
"The knife went in."
Passive voice. Focus on others. Go read the book.
Dalrympal is the author?
Have you read Life At The Bottom yet? Go read it and it will all make sense to you.
"The knife went in."
Passive voice. Focus on others. Go read the book.
I haven't seen it anywhere, but was he legally allowed to possess a gun? My guess would be no, but not sure.
Fox 59 has reported that Major Davis II had no felony convictions , next thing we will see is the family retaining a lawyer and suing for the shooting of their perfect family member
Dalrympal is the author?
Dalrympal is the author?
Fox news interviewed the neighbors. One saw the entire thing. Major would not comply when the LEO told him repeatedly to put down his gun. Major started the shoot out in their words.
He was a freaking nut.
Why was this guy shooting an AK in the first place? Didn't the officer respond to "shots fired"? I haven't seen an explanation of what starting it yet but I haven't read every story.
Does the family excuse recreational AK shooting downtown?
Witness, family friend describe events leading up to officer?s killing | Fox 59 News ? fox59.comFox news interviewed the neighbors. One saw the entire thing. Major would not comply when the LEO told him repeatedly to put down his gun. Major started the shoot out in their words.
He was a freaking nut.
Just ordered through Amazon for less than 5 bucks. Looking forward to the read.
And the reason we would give a rat's ass about what his family said is.....................................................
calvin and hobbs
I agree, it is very detail specific. You have seen my posts though, I'm sure of it. With no laws being broken, a stop for firearm related questioning should be none. For a firearm related offense, it should be directly related to the offense and not fishing.
Here is why they say "He was a good boy" or "He was just getting his life turned around" or other such nonsense. They NEED to believe that their (insert relationship here) was a good person. They do not want to believe that they were a "bad guy" and got what was coming to them for their decisions.
And the reason we would give a rat's ass about what his family said is.....................................................
He said it was detail specific. He said in the absence of a crime/suspected crime. Seems pretty clear that the investigation of (possible) crime with a suspect description falls into the acceptable category.So if there is a robbery reported with the suspect being a (insert your physical description) wearing a black shirt and jeans and you match the description up to and including the clothes you arent fair game for a quick game of 20 questions simply because the officers are expected to have ESP? Please. If shots are fired and cops see someone holding a long gun of COURSE they are fair game for questions.