How you can ignore the reactions of these girls astounds me. You are just as sick and F**ed up as him IMHO.
How you can ignore the reactions of these girls astounds me. You are just as sick and F**ed up as him IMHO.
I really don't care what you think you saw. If something happened with kids, where are the complaints filed? Where are the arrests?
Grampa Joe may not live to your standards. Tough ****. Don't vote for him.
There still is an ability in this country to be assumed innocent until proved guilty.
I'm done with all this shock and amazement you guys allege. Politics is a dirty business, primarily because some voters like to roll around in sleaze.
First of all, I'm a Libertarian, not a conservative christian Republican. I dont fit neatly into the box you attempted to stick me in. I agree with some of Trumps policies, but do not like him as a man. But he is far superior to the on a stick your side keeps trotting out. Blatantly statist and more importantly anti constitutionalist views. (Trump too with his bump stock ban)
Thats an understatement. As the father of a daughter, if I saw him being this "close" and affectionate to my daughter at one of these events, I guarantee I'd have some serious issues with Secret Service agents beating my ass for my reaction to this creeper. NOBODY outside blood relatives needs to be fondling hair, sniffing, kissing, or getting that close to EITHER of my kids. No. Just no. If you cant see that is wrong you have some serious issues.
How you can ignore the reactions of these girls astounds me. You are just as sick and F**ed up as him IMHO.
Hear that Mary Jane?Last chance for this one.
Seriously.
One more time to kill the pain.Hear that Mary Jane?
Didn't they go back and stealth edit their article (i.e. no stated correction) to remove some of that language. If I'm thinking of the same article, I also like that they reminder the alleged victim that filing a false police report was a crime...New York Times says no sexual assault...
Their golden standard?
“beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.”
Well excuse the hell outta me, but isn't that sexual assault?
Here's the problem...
It was for sexual assault Kavanaugh according to their divine wisdom, and he was a drunk college kid at the time.
Two standards, one for the people they like, one for the people they don't like.
Only they get to choose what standard applies, and when...
https://www.westernjournal.com/cruc...yrzkwc6NPMkprIkkiqOAVHalmpE-P7ULdJQIGhBNk0UAM
Didn't they go back and stealth edit their article (i.e. no stated correction) to remove some of that language. If I'm thinking of the same article, I also like that they reminder the alleged victim that filing a false police report was a crime...
You call it manhandling. I haven't seen evidence of it. .
gifs not working for you?
You call it manhandling. I call it highly selective video editing.
If that is manhandling, I have seen home movies from family reunions that with your video editing skills using zoom and slo mo that you could make look like the start of a soft porn flick.
I call that wishful thinking.
The mother****er is a creeper.
Maybe, but the gifs don't prove it anymore than your avatar looks like you.