Is Jared Fogel from Subway fame dead?

[IndyDave1776]

I'm talking specifically to the latest texts with the 16 year old. What crime was there? Yeah, I'm aware he could get gigged for what could potentially be on his computers, but with this girl what crime occurred? If things went as asserted? Solicitation isn't a federal offence, last time I checked.

I can see two possibilities although I do not have any particular reason to believe that they apply. First would be the Mann Act in the event that he brought or arranged to have her brought across state lines for sexual purposes which, incidentally, is the charge used against Elliot Spitzer. The other possibility is that having sex with a 16 year old would be legal; However, if he took any pictures, he is wide open for kiddie porn charges.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Subway Spokesman Jared Fogle Assembles Criminal Defense Team - WBIW.com / State

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Subway Spokesman Jared Fogle Assembles Criminal Defense Team - WBIW.com / State

 

[invent11]

Hopefully all the rumors are not true about him right now. If they are, he deserves what he gets.

 

[invent11]

If he paid to have sex with a 16 year old girl he is a piece of %&it. He will deserve whatever he gets and more.

 

[HoughMade]

I'm talking specifically to the latest texts with the 16 year old. What crime was there? Yeah, I'm aware he could get gigged for what could potentially be on his computers, but with this girl what crime occurred? If things went as asserted? Solicitation isn't a federal offence, last time I checked.

What charges? Ask this guy:

Judge Rejects Reduced Sentence In Former Pastor?s Sex Case « CBS Chicago

Again, depends on the allegations.

(a) Transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. A person who knowingly transports an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any commonwealth, territory or possession of the United States, with intent that the individual engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.

18 USCS § 2423

But I would like to see the texts. There is a big difference between: "Hey Burt, guess what I just did. I paid for sex with a 16 year old. I checked her I.D. to make sure." and "Yeah, I met up with her and we played hide the six inch then I bought her an iPhone."

 

[steveh_131]

What charges? Ask this guy:

Judge Rejects Reduced Sentence In Former Pastor?s Sex Case « CBS Chicago

I went to his church in my younger years. I liked him more than the previous pastor.

What a horrible church that was.

 

[HoughMade]

I went to his church in my younger years. I liked him more than the previous pastor.

What a horrible church that was.

Yeah. I have a lot of thoughts on him and the church, but I'll do something rare and keep them to myself.

 

[Dead Duck]

I went to his church in my younger years. I liked him more than the previous pastor.

What a horrible church that was.

 

[steveh_131]

Fortunately, I wasn't a 16 year old girl under his counseling...

 

[steveh_131]

Yeah. I have a lot of thoughts on him and the church, but I'll do something rare and keep them to myself.

Hey, this isn't a banned topic any more. I say let'er rip.

 

[HoughMade]

Hey, this isn't a banned topic any more. I say let'er rip.

I'll let Youtube do my talking:

[video=youtube;IGvaFBkhDaQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGvaFBkhDaQ[/video]

 

[steveh_131]

Oh lawd, not the pole polishing video. Geeze that was uncomfortable

 

[Timjoebillybob]

I went to his church in my younger years. I liked him more than the previous pastor.

What a horrible church that was.

Isn't that the church that's affiliated with hyles anderson?

 

[steveh_131]

Isn't that the church that's affiliated with hyles anderson?

Yes

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I'll let Youtube do my talking:

These are mere allegations!!!

(Ok, I know, I read the sentencing memorandum . . . I know they are not)

 

[printcraft]

I had subway for lunch today.... I told them to make it with the freshest bread they had.....

 

[mrjarrell]

What charges? Ask this guy:

Judge Rejects Reduced Sentence In Former Pastor?s Sex Case « CBS Chicago

Again, depends on the allegations.


18 USCS § 2423

But I would like to see the texts. There is a big difference between: "Hey Burt, guess what I just did. I paid for sex with a 16 year old. I checked her I.D. to make sure." and "Yeah, I met up with her and we played hide the six inch then I bought her an iPhone."

This was already brought up by another poster, but there is no evidence of transporting anyone across state lines, as yet. That's fantasy. I'm asking solely about charges based on what we know. 1. Having sex with a 16 year old. 2. Paying her $100. The first isn't a crime. The second is, at best a misdemeanor, right? And is there not a statute of limitations on it? So far all we've got is someone saying he did it. No telling what's in his texts, vis a vis his reply to the text.

 

[HoughMade]

This was already brought up by another poster, but there is no evidence of transporting anyone across state lines, as yet. That's fantasy. I'm asking solely about charges based on what we know. 1. Having sex with a 16 year old. 2. Paying her $100. The first isn't a crime. The second is, at best a misdemeanor, right? And is there not a statute of limitations on it? So far all we've got is someone saying he did it. No telling what's in his texts, vis a vis his reply to the text.

We haven't seen any evidence yet. Who knows what, where, when or how? I certainly don't. I wouldn't call it any more fantasy than what has been reported which is hearsay based on hearsay, reported as speculation...which may be true.

 

[Dead Duck]

This was already brought up by another poster, but there is no evidence of transporting anyone across state lines, as yet. That's fantasy. I'm asking solely about charges based on what we know. 1. Having sex with a 16 year old. 2. Paying her $100. The first isn't a crime. The second is, at best a misdemeanor, right? And is there not a statute of limitations on it? So far all we've got is someone saying he did it. No telling what's in his texts, vis a vis his reply to the text.

Ok -
Now I'm pissed. Only $100.00? Really??

I got totally ripped off.