In France They Punch White Girls

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    I figure CNN might be more acceptable News source, than News14 - All Im trying to get at, brother.

    It's not News for me; it was merely captured on video tape, with glee. This is only one in millions. It's apart of the guilt trip Whites are forced to endure for a slanted version of history.

    Race is only irrelevent with crime when it's not P.C.
    And liberals are racist, only they're racism is aimed at White people. Which is acceptable, right?

    There is no such thing as "reverse racism", by definition one would not be racist (loaded word, BTW).


    Public Servant, why does someone have to have a history, or shout racist slurs, to be Racist?

    The 1964 Federal Civil Rights Law, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2), permits federal prosecution of anyone who "willingly injures, intimidates or interferes with another person, or attempts to do so, by force because of the other person's race, color, religion or national origin"
    Link - Hate crime laws

    Im sure France is even more liberal, regarding this issue. But one simple fact of life in America is -




    Sorry, Whites Not Protected Under ‘Hate’ Crime Law

    by La Shawn on 04.13.05
    in Lunacy, Race Preferences

    Update (4/14): Have you ever been the victim of a “hate crime” but the perpetrator wasn’t charged with a hate crime? E-mail your story.
    ———————————————————————————————————–
    Although a gang of black boys (up to 30!) beat four white girls bloody while calling them “white crackers” and shouting “black power,” the cops say it’s not a hate crime. No explanation appears in the article.
    According to the New York penal code (crime occurred in New York), a hate crime is an offense “committed against persons intentionally selected ‘because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation’ of those persons.”


    Beating white females and calling them “white crackers.” Sounds like a hate crime to me. Then again, who am I but a reasonable person living in the real world and not a pre-programmed politically correct grievance shopper living in a socialist utopia inside my own head?
    Read about another non-hate crime where black football players knocked out a white man while he was dancing with his black wife because he’s a white man married to a black woman.


    Judges in Georgia struck down this nonsense.
    Remember the Hmong immigrant who killed white people in Wisconsin? Not a hate crime.


    Imagine a couple of white men beating a homosexual to a bloody pulp while shouting “fag.” Wait a minute…that happened. The sordid incident was made into a made-for-TV movie! Both killers are serving life. And yes, it was called a hate crime.


    Hate crime laws are designed to punish the thoughts of white, straight, Christian males. [Lest liberals think I'm calling all white males charged with hate crimes "Christians," I decided to strike it from the description.] Only blacks, homosexuals, Hispanics and Muslims (women, too, on a good day) are protected under these laws. I’m black, so I guess I qualify for the skin privilege.
    My gratitude is gushing all over the place. Really.



    I linked it for you. That is just afew stories, of which they occur everyday. The Mainstream Media never reports them, just the local internet spiff, can you imagine if 30 plus Whites guys were beating a 2 black women shouting racial slurs, the hammer, as required by Hate crime, would be dropped, as it should be; but not for the black men who viciously attacked those young white girls.

    Surprise surprise, America.

    1113492.jpg


    Eric Holder: "No Hate Crime Protection for White Christians or Servicemen" Jul 17th, 2009
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    I figure CNN might be more acceptable News source, than News14 - All Im trying to get at, brother.

    It's not News for me; it was merely captured on video tape, with glee. This is only one in millions. It's apart of the guilt trip Whites are forced to endure for a slanted version of history.

    Race is only irrelevent with crime when it's not P.C.
    And liberals are racist, only they're racism is aimed at White people. Which is acceptable, right?

    There is no such thing as "reverse racism", by definition one would not be racist (loaded word, BTW).


    Public Servant, why does someone have to have a history, or shout racist slurs, to be Racist?

    The 1964 Federal Civil Rights Law, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2), permits federal prosecution of anyone who "willingly injures, intimidates or interferes with another person, or attempts to do so, by force because of the other person's race, color, religion or national origin"
    Link - Hate crime laws

    Im sure France is even more liberal, regarding this issue. But one simple fact of life in America is -




    Sorry, Whites Not Protected Under ‘Hate’ Crime Law

    by La Shawn on 04.13.05
    in Lunacy, Race Preferences

    Update (4/14): Have you ever been the victim of a “hate crime” but the perpetrator wasn’t charged with a hate crime? E-mail your story.
    ———————————————————————————————————–
    Although a gang of black boys (up to 30!) beat four white girls bloody while calling them “white crackers” and shouting “black power,” the cops say it’s not a hate crime. No explanation appears in the article.
    According to the New York penal code (crime occurred in New York), a hate crime is an offense “committed against persons intentionally selected ‘because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation’ of those persons.”


    Beating white females and calling them “white crackers.” Sounds like a hate crime to me. Then again, who am I but a reasonable person living in the real world and not a pre-programmed politically correct grievance shopper living in a socialist utopia inside my own head?
    Read about another non-hate crime where black football players knocked out a white man while he was dancing with his black wife because he’s a white man married to a black woman.


    Judges in Georgia struck down this nonsense.
    Remember the Hmong immigrant who killed white people in Wisconsin? Not a hate crime.


    Imagine a couple of white men beating a homosexual to a bloody pulp while shouting “fag.” Wait a minute…that happened. The sordid incident was made into a made-for-TV movie! Both killers are serving life. And yes, it was called a hate crime.


    Hate crime laws are designed to punish the thoughts of white, straight, Christian males. [Lest liberals think I'm calling all white males charged with hate crimes "Christians," I decided to strike it from the description.] Only blacks, homosexuals, Hispanics and Muslims (women, too, on a good day) are protected under these laws. I’m black, so I guess I qualify for the skin privilege.
    My gratitude is gushing all over the place. Really.



    I linked it for you. That is just afew stories, of which they occur everyday. The Mainstream Media never reports them, just the local internet spiff, can you imagine if 30 plus Whites guys were beating a 2 black women shouting racial slurs, the hammer, as required by Hate crime, would be dropped, as it should be; but not for the black men who viciously attacked those young white girls.

    Surprise surprise, America.

    1113492.jpg


    Eric Holder: "No Hate Crime Protection for White Christians or Servicemen" Jul 17th, 2009
     

    42769vette

    Grandmaster
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    52   0   0
    Oct 6, 2008
    15,280
    113
    south of richmond in
    So, you're basically stooping to the level of Al Sharpton. Great job.

    Even so, this is so obviously not a hate crime it's laughable. Let's stop and actually think about this for a second. She got punched because she didn't give out her number. I don't know about you, but I've never gone up to a woman that I hated and asked for her number. Men ask women for their numbers because they are attracted to the women, not because they hate them.

    So essentially you're saying that this guy hated this girl so much that he wanted to date her.


    why would he be seriously asking for her number to take her on a date with one buddy running a camera and another waiting to kick her legs out from under her.

    i bet if she would have given her number she would have gotten hit and her legs kicked out from under her.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    The spin doctors cant answer for alot of the questions regarding this incident.

    It's appearant the gang and this young lady had a prior encounter that did not go over well.

    They must have planned for this, and ambushed her proof is in the evidence.



    In the epic beard man, it was clearly racist, too... Yet not a single hate crime charge.

    "Say it again pinky"

    "Beat his white ass"

    then when the 'beat down' didnt happen like it was supposed it people then wanted to stop it...

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzoXmapRxqE"]YouTube - Epic Beard Man AC Bus Fight Vietnam Tom TKO[/ame]



    Post number 11


    Sharpshooter​


    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Location: Plainfield, Indiana
    Posts: 894
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_gold.gif
    reputation_gold.gif
    reputation_gold.gif
    reputation_gold.gif



    A white teenager refuses to give her mobile number, she gets hit ...
    The scene seems to unfold in the space of movement between the mall and esplanade 2 Bobigny prefecture in Bobigny, near metro and tram.

    The Black man after hitting her says:

    Quote:
    Traduction : “Ça, c’est pour les filles qui ne veulent pas donner leur numéro de téléphone portable, qui ne veulent pas coopérer, voilà ce qu’il se passe, ca part trop vite. Mort de rire. Boboch (Bobigny), c’est fou les mecs ! “
    Translation:

    Quote:
    Translation: "That's for girls who do not want to give their mobile number, who will not cooperate, that's what happens too quickly from ca. Death of laughter. Boboche (Bobigny), it's crazy guys!
     

    public servant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    In the epic beard man, it was clearly racist, too... Yet not a single hate crime charge.

    "Say it again pinky"

    "Beat his white ass"

    then when the 'beat down' didnt happen like it was supposed it people then wanted to stop it...
    No reason for anyone to be charged with a any crime. Justice was already served. He got his ass handed to him.
     

    JetGirl

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    May 7, 2008
    18,774
    83
    N/E Corner

    Benny

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 66.7%
    2   1   0
    May 20, 2008
    21,037
    38
    Drinking your milkshake
    why would he be seriously asking for her number to take her on a date with one buddy running a camera and another waiting to kick her legs out from under her.

    i bet if she would have given her number she would have gotten hit and her legs kicked out from under her.

    Exactly.

    I still don't see it as a hate crime though.

    I just see it as 3 worthless pieces of :poop: picking on a harmless girl for no apparent reason other than she doesn't give her number out to trash.

    I hope they all three die in a house fire sooner rather than later.
     
    Last edited:
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    Again quoting from white supremacist news sources? I'm seeing a pattern here...

    I give it as much credit as I would as news from a "Black Panther" site.



    ROTFL

    Show me the supremacism please, I looked prior to this post and I found no Fatherland shirts or even "Aryan" wear crap.

    About Us
    European Union Times is an international newspaper based in Europe with operational branches in America and Canada. Our online edition of The European Union Times (also known as The EU Times) is constantly updated to bring you the top news stories from around the world. It is produced by a dedicated staff from the European Union and by contributors from all around the world. EUTimes.net/International features the latest multimedia technologies, from live video streaming to audio packages to searchable archives of news features and background information. The site is updated continuously throughout the day.



    This is really getting old... Denouncing the News because of the source.:noway: It doesnt change the truth. Bias doesnt change the truth, the truth will always be the truth no matter the source.

    Public Servant, if you dont like the source, go find another source. It's all over the internet - Would you like me to find a source for you?:dunno:
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    No reason for anyone to be charged with a any crime. Justice was already served. He got his ass handed to him.

    I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

    The attacker proved his willingness to be a threat to society; fortunately he tangoed with a Viet nam vet who knew how to put foot to butt.

    A criminal shouldn't be given a free pass, just because the outcome didnt favor them.

    And as Jetgirl reported, HE was the one thrown off the bus, for his defense. Who knows what happened to his stuff after that lady (who was promoting this fight until her attacker started to lose with obvious racial slurs)
     

    public servant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    ROTFL

    Show me the supremacism please, I looked prior to this post and I found no Fatherland shirts or even "Aryan" wear crap.





    This is really getting old... Denouncing the News because of the source.:noway: It doesnt change the truth. Bias doesnt change the truth, the truth will always be the truth no matter the source.

    Public Servant, if you dont like the source, go find another source. It's all over the internet - Would you like me to find a source for you?:dunno:
    Apparently you failed to surf around and look into the articles concerning white extinction and such. I agree it's a little more watered down than your last source...but the message doesn't change much.

    No thanks. I'll find my own sources for the news. I've read your sources and have drawn my own conclusion.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    Apparently you failed to surf around and look into the articles concerning white extinction and such. I agree it's a little more watered down than your last source...but the message doesn't change much.

    No thanks. I'll find my own sources for the news. I've read your sources and have drawn my own conclusion.

    LOL so you think the U.S. census is lying? or European census is lying?

    Fine, not my issue. Im not the O.P. but as I said, the source doesnt matter, IMO, the stories do :yesway:


    I briefly looked and found this site regarding Racist Holder and his desires, cited for your approvel as always.



    Holder: Whites and Ministers will not be protected by proposed hate crimes legislation. Attorney General Eric Holder testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 25 and gave startling testimony that means Christian ministers and whites will not be protected under the hate crimes statute proposed by the Department of Justice. Holder says that the proposed statute would only protect “traditional” victims of hate crimes, and then he goes on to name a series of Democratic Party constituencies.




    You can either launch the video here or click the webstream link here to see his testimony for yourself.
    Senator Sessions asks Holder about the scope of the protected classes. (Beginning at 58:43 – running through 60:09) Sessions presents a hypothetical where a minister gives a sermon, quotes the Bible about homosexuality and is thereafter attacked by a gay activist because of what the minister said about his religious beliefs and what scripture says about homosexuality.
    Holder: “Well the statute would not necessarily cover that. On the other hand, I think the concern that actually has been expressed is if the action was reversed. . . . We are talking about, if in fact the person, we are talking about crimes that have a historic basis. Groups who have been targeted for violence as a result of their skin color, sexual orientation, that is what this legislation is designed to cover. The fact that someone might strike somebody as a result of pure speech, again, . . . we don’t have the indication that somebody was motivated to strike at somebody because they were in one of these protected classes. That would not be covered by the statute.”
    Later, Senator Tom Coburn asks Holder if the muslim radical who killed army recruiter Pvt. Long committed a hate crime. Holder’s equivocation was disturbing. “There is a certain element of hate in that, I suppose.” He would suppose. You can see him “suppose” at minute 73:00.
    Then Holder goes on to list the only groups intended to be protected by the proposed law. This is racial identity politics taking a sinister turn. Holder explicitly says the proposed law only protects classes “where there is a history” of violence against those groups. “What we are looking for here in terms of expansion of the statute are instances where there is a historic basis. See, groups of people who are singled out for violence perpetrated against them because of who they are. I don’t know if we have the same historical record to say members of our military have been targeted in the same way that people who are African American, people who are Jewish, people who are gay, have been targeted over the many years.” (minute 73:00-74:00)
    Based on Holder’s testimony, it is clear that the law would not protect white victims who were attacked because of their race by racial minorities. Holder’s testimony explicitly excluded prosecution of the gay activist who attacks a Christian minister or priest because of his sermon on homosexuality, but the legislation protects the gay activist when he is attacked. This is a dangerous development to our laws and our nation. One of the most fundamental principles in the founding of this nation was that all are created equal. A bloody Civil War was fought to sustain it. No group enjoys privileged status over the other. Once the Department can decide to protect certain individuals for crimes, and not others, those not protected will lose faith in the system. Loss of faith in the system is more than a simple inconvenience. Confidence that laws are enforced fairly and equally preserves peace and prosperity. Lawlessness ensues when the law is perceived as a weapon against certain groups for the benefit of other groups. It is not enough to simply point to a bundle of statistics or history, or to Matthew Sheppard, to justify unfairness in the law.

    Muslims dont have a history of attacking U.S. Soldiers? Killing U.S. Soldiers?

    Gays can be violent?

    :popcorn::popcorn:

    One reason I refuse to relay on the Justice System in America, because Justice wont come to me, if Im the victim, being a White, straight male who was in the Military.

    Thank you Holder!

    Public Servant, I hope this is to your liking, it's conservative but nonetheless. :dunno:

    Realize Im trying to work with you :)
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    world traveler :)
    supporter.gif


    Join Date: Jun 2008
    Location: SW Indy
    Posts: 3,503
    reputation_silverstar.gif
    reputation_bronzestar.gif
    reputation_bronzestar.gif
    reputation_bronzestar.gif
    reputation_bronzestar.gif

    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_green.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif
    reputation_greenh.gif



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by NordicHeathenVinlander
    I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

    Agreed. I guess my problem is I see the world as having criminals and as having law-abiding people. I don't see them as "black" criminals or "white" criminals. :dunno:

    Same with those who are law-abiding.

    I guess I'm color blind.

    :yesway:

    You are lucky then; I am not fortunate enough to be as blind as you, but in a better world I would gladly be as you in a heart beat.


    I'll be blind when Affirmative action, and other quota hire/admissions agendas are dissolved, aswell as the "entitlement agenda" is repulsed, and people quit getting something for nothing.

    I'll be blind when unconstitutional "hate crime laws" are dissolved, and outlawed on the basis they violate "equality".

    I'll be blind when I no longer have to hear slanted versions of history
    aswell as when Im not being forced to assimilate into Mexican culture for the joy of multiculturalism :)


    Again, brother you are a lucky man, and for your obvious luck, I must rep you! :patriot:
     

    astragoth

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2010
    9
    3
    Heh the sources are the same its just what stories get reported. Its pretty sad when I
    can't trust my own media and have to go to Russia Today or something similar.
     

    techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    It is when they form partnerships like this. You're either kidding yourself or in denial.

    Or he is a frequent poster at Stormfront who is here to spread his message. Perhaps he speaks here gently instead of his usual more open comments there:

    This is why we need guns - Stormfront

    Re: This is why we need guns
    You just watched the typical life in the hood, and negro behavior, and all I see is "TNB".


    STFU! Despite the victims were Asian, many many many more are White, and many dont venture into negroid areas.


    This is why, I wont get punched first, and why Im ready to crush the skull of these monkeys.

    "TNB", I guess I better make up a slogan for cowardice Whites, "TWB"..

    My one question: How much longer? How many more?

    Why no eye for an eye?
    __________________
    "I crush down many thousands at once for my begetter begot me to have no enemy to conquer me" -IndrafromIndra chastises his son
    "I gave the Earth to the Aryan"-IndrafromSoma And Indra and the Eagle
    WHAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP THE WHITE RACE: Idea1andIdea2
    PLE:Location, North Dakota-Visit link for details.
    INDO-EUROPEAN PAGANS AND HEATHENS BECOME UNITED!!
    WHITE MAN sharpen your Axe and Swords, prepare for war!

    Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket http://i868.photobucket.com/albums/a...anBeatdown.gifhttp://tickers.baby-gaga.com/p/dev338pr___.png



    By Axe and Shield they will know our nam
    When the North Star rises, the Earth will quake at our passing

    There is nothing at all unintentional about this new guest of ours here. He is merely a fisher of men, but in a very different sort of way...
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,634
    Messages
    9,955,610
    Members
    54,898
    Latest member
    jojo99
    Top Bottom