I am still not sold that this ticket was actually issued. And if it was, it should have the IC written on the ticket and we can know for sure exactly what the OP was cited for.
It is the internet. Oh well, been fun.
I am still not sold that this ticket was actually issued. And if it was, it should have the IC written on the ticket and we can know for sure exactly what the OP was cited for.
So, every time we get heavy snow or sub zero temps, we should call the State Police to see if we are allowed to drive?Yeah, why should people take the responsibility to inform themselves.
Since working at the Family Express is NOT considered an essential job (ie firefighter, nurse, doctor, emergency worker), you should have the cops talk to her boss. He is asking her to break the law by coming in to work.
Or listen to the radio, watch TV or check the internet.So, every time we get heavy snow or sub zero temps, we should call the State Police to see if we are allowed to drive?
IC 10-14-3-29.5
Designation of a local travel advisory
Sec. 29.5. (a) If the principal executive officer of a political subdivision issues a local travel advisory as part of an emergency declaration under section 29 of this chapter, the principal executive officer shall designate the travel advisory as falling into one (1) of the following categories:
(1) "Advisory", the lowest level of local travel advisory, means that routine travel or activities may be restricted in areas because of a hazardous situation, and individuals should use caution or avoid those areas.
(2) "Watch" means that conditions are threatening to the safety of the public. During a "watch" local travel advisory, only essential travel, such as to and from work or in emergency situations, is recommended, and emergency action plans should be implemented by businesses, schools, government agencies, and other organizations.
(3) "Warning", the highest level of local travel advisory, means that travel may be restricted to emergency management workers only. During a "warning" local travel advisory, individuals are directed to:
(A) refrain from all travel;
(B) comply with necessary emergency measures;
(C) cooperate with public officials and disaster services forces in executing emergency operations plans; and
(D) obey and comply with the lawful directions of properly identified officers.
Further and more specific restrictions, including parking restrictions, may be included in a "warning" local travel advisory.
(b) If the emergency management agency director or the principal executive officer of a political subdivision determines that conditions within the political subdivision have created the need for travel advisory restrictions without a local disaster emergency declaration under section 29 of this chapter, the emergency management agency director or the principal executive officer may issue an "advisory" or a "watch" level travel advisory.
(c) A "warning" level travel advisory may be issued only after a local disaster emergency is declared under section 29 of this chapter.
As added by P.L.40-2011, SEC.2.
IC 10-14-3-34
Offenses
Sec. 34. A person who knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly violates this chapter commits a Class B misdemeanor.
IC 35-50-3-3
Class B misdemeanor
Sec. 3. A person who commits a Class B misdemeanor shall be imprisoned for a fixed term of not more than one hundred eighty (180) days; in addition, he may be fined not more than one thousand
dollars ($1,000).
Sounds like some pretty serious stuff and I doubt ignorance of the emergency warning will get you out of it in court. Its always the operators responsibility to be aware of current conditions.
Knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly.
Knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly.
Knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly.
The state only has to prove one of the three.
The state only has to prove one of the three.
How do you prove someone driving knowingly, intentionally or recklessly violated the warning?The state only has to prove one of the three.
It is really beyond me and the concept of a free America that the right of travel can be taken away without any recourse..
Nope. Lake County. 65 doesn't go through Porter County.Well as to the op getting a ticket at the top of the ramp I would think the Officer was at fault issuing the ticket. Even with the above code, the rightful position of the officers position would be at the ramps entry to redirect vehicles away from the closed roadway. This not only would have made more sense for unknowing motorists but it would have been safer for said motorists when they were turned back from the closed roadway being forced to drive the wrong way on the ramp and exit in such a manner to endanger any other motorists on the adjoining road.
IC 10-14-3-34
Offenses
Sec. 34. A person who knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly violates this chapter commits a Class B misdemeanor.
The problem with this stipulation of the code is that the officer has to substantiate that the motorists has in deed knowingly, intentionally, and recklessly violated the road closure which if the first interaction with the officer was as stated he clearly didn't do.
If I read this correctly though this was in Porter Country and you will loose any court battle if you have the hearing in Porter Country, best to get a change of venue based on requiring a fair and impartial hearing on the ticket...
It is really beyond me and the concept of a free America that the right of travel can be taken away without any recourse, a sign of the times we live in I guess... That said please take in consideration that even though I beleive it is our right to travel regardless of conditions, it is also our responsibility to make said travels as safely as we can and too not expect others to go into harms way to rescue us for our decisions...
Fight the ticket OP... but do it smart...
Well as to the op getting a ticket at the top of the ramp I would think the Officer was at fault issuing the ticket. Even with the above code, the rightful position of the officers position would be at the ramps entry to redirect vehicles away from the closed roadway.