Haley 2024?

[Route 45]

Analysis: Legal Scholar Claims U.S. Constitution Disqualifies Nikki Haley from Presidential or Vice-Presidential Candidacy | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Paul Ingrassia has reignited the fiery debate over what it means to be a “natural born citizen” under the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[jamil]

Regardless, she’s obviously not “American”.



She didn’t have a clue. I don’t think she’s just being a closet white supremacist. I think she just doesn’t know. Her answer is exactly how people answer when they don’t know. We don’t even need yo get into her citizenship eligibility. That alone should be enough to disqualify her. Blackrock gonna drop her like a used rubber.

 

[Ingomike]

How GDP Growth Under Trump Compares To Clinton, Obama And Other Presidents

With the presidential election less than a week away, Americans are weighing the two presidential candidates and choosing which is best for the country over the next four years --if they haven't already voted.One way they can do that is by looking back on the first term of President Donald Trump...

finance.yahoo.com

Of course only you can determine how you did.

Not mine. Clinton was better.

Interesting how it ALWAYS goes against Trump. Even without considering the obstacles Trump averaged a respectable 2.5% until they added a data point that one required a different source hence the disclaimer they added. “The 2020 estimate comes from the Federal Reserve”.

Then no accounting for the pandemic response…

 

[Ingomike]

Analysis: Legal Scholar Claims U.S. Constitution Disqualifies Nikki Haley from Presidential or Vice-Presidential Candidacy | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

Paul Ingrassia has reignited the fiery debate over what it means to be a “natural born citizen” under the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

SCOTUS needs to settle this one way or the other, just define “natural born citizen” and get it done.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Regardless, she’s obviously not “American”.



She didn’t have a clue. I don’t think she’s just being a closet white supremacist. I think she just doesn’t know. Her answer is exactly how people answer when they don’t know. We don’t even need yo get into her citizenship eligibility. That alone should be enough to disqualify her. Blackrock gonna drop her like a used rubber.

Vivek had the best result to this question.

 

[jamil]

SCOTUS needs to settle this one way or the other, just define “natural born citizen” and get it done.

Really I think that should fall on congress but I don’t trust them not to **** it up. Democrats would call it anyone who steps foot in the US, legally or not. And Republicans would go along with it so they can hire cheap labor to clean their pools, tend their landscaping, and nanny their kids.

Plus, how is Rashida Talib gonna be POTUS?

 

[Ingomike]

Really I think that should fall on congress but I don’t trust them not to **** it up. Democrats would call it anyone who steps foot in the US, legally or not. And Republicans would go along with it so they can hire cheap labor to clean their pools, tend their landscaping, and nanny their kids.

Plus, how is Rashida Talib gonna be POTUS?

That is not congress responsibility. Constitutionally it is SCOTUS to define what the founders meant. Why did you suggest congress?

 

[jamil]

That is not congress responsibility. Constitutionally it is SCOTUS to define what the founders meant. Why did you suggest congress?

The founders left it vague. Who the **** knows what they meant. There is a process by which Congress can change the constitution to spell it out in plainer terms.. But as I said it’s filled with risk.

 

[Ingomike]

The founders left it vague. Who the **** knows what they meant. There is a process by which Congress can change the constitution to spell it out in plainer terms.. But as I said it’s filled with risk.

Are you vaguely referring to the amendment process? Or something else?

 

[jamil]

Are you vaguely referring to the amendment process? Or something else?

I hope this doesn’t become one of those long side topics. It was mostly to set up the congress sux and Talib as President joke.

I’m serious that I’d rather have congress do this though. Right the amendment, get the votes, put it to the states, and get it ratified. I’m trying to head off you saying I’m saying something I didn’t say. Congress has the power to change naturalization laws. Since the constitution explicitly has the requirement of “naturally born citizen” for potus/vpotus I don’t really know how much congress could reword it to clarify through just legislation.

But anyway “change the constitution” is not at all vague.

 

[DadSmith]

CNN Iowa town hall: Haley calls for GOP to move past Trump and boasts leads over Biden - Washington Examiner

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley bragged about polls showing her beating President Joe Biden and called for the GOP to move past former President Donald Trump during a CNN town hall in Iowa on Thursday night. "Americans don't want another nail-biter of an election, and that's what...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[Ingomike]

CNN Iowa town hall: Haley calls for GOP to move past Trump and boasts leads over Biden - Washington Examiner

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley bragged about polls showing her beating President Joe Biden and called for the GOP to move past former President Donald Trump during a CNN town hall in Iowa on Thursday night. "Americans don't want another nail-biter of an election, and that's what...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

She also said that New Hampshirite need to “correct” Iowa, insinuating she will lose Iowa and NH must win for her.

Nikki Haley Managed to Insult All of Iowa's GOP Voters With 1 Weird Trick

pjmedia.com

She is way too cozy with WEF, she was named as a “Young Global Leader” by the World Economic Forum in 2011. Must have been a very good student to get that award four years after her first visit…

 

[Ingomike]

This is awesome, these nicknames seem to work.

KISS OF DEATH: Nikki New Taxes | Donald J. Trump For President 2024

Certified Website of Donald J. Trump For President 2024. America's comeback starts right now. Join our movement to Make America Great Again!

www.donaldjtrump.com

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[KG1]

She also said that New Hampshirite need to “correct” Iowa, insinuating she will lose Iowa and NH must win for her.

Nikki Haley Managed to Insult All of Iowa's GOP Voters With 1 Weird Trick

pjmedia.com

She is way too cozy with WEF, she was named as a “Young Global Leader” by the World Economic Forum in 2011. Must have been a very good student to get that award four years after her first visit…

Trump should move away from Haley for a VP consideration when he wins the nomination.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Trump should move away from Haley for a VP consideration when he wins the nomination.

I think Noem is bucking for it now.

 

[KG1]

This is awesome, these nicknames seem to work.

KISS OF DEATH: Nikki New Taxes | Donald J. Trump For President 2024

Certified Website of Donald J. Trump For President 2024. America's comeback starts right now. Join our movement to Make America Great Again!

www.donaldjtrump.com

Nikki "Read my lips" Haley.

 

[HoughMade]

SCOTUS needs to settle this one way or the other, just define “natural born citizen” and get it done.

As regards to Nikki Haley's situation, the Supreme Court decided the issue in 1898. One would think some preeminent something would do a little research and figure it out. Oh wait...he has a position he wants to advocate and isn't objective? SHOCKING.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 704, 18 S. Ct. 456, 478, 42 L. Ed. 890 (1898)

 

[KG1]

I think Noem is bucking for it now.

She seems to be even though she said she's not particularly interested before.

 

[Ingomike]

As regards to Nikki Haley's situation, the Supreme Court decided the issue in 1898. One would think some preeminent something would do a little research and figure it out. Oh wait...he has a position he wants to advocate and isn't objective? SHOCKING.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 704, 18 S. Ct. 456, 478, 42 L. Ed. 890 (1898)

Not something I have studied but those bringing this up do note a difference from Wong.

“The discussion, Ingrassia notes, diverges from the precedent of Wong Kim Ark, where the Supreme Court addressed birthright citizenship but did not conflate this with the specific breed of natural-born citizenship needed for presidential eligibility.”