Obviously there are those on both sides with an agenda. And you actually posted that AA&E? You couldn't have believed that so readily? C'mon surely your spidey sense would have kicked in and told you to question the validity.
Obviously there are those on both sides with an agenda. And you actually posted that AA&E? You couldn't have believed that so readily? C'mon surely your spidey sense would have kicked in and told you to question the validity.
Obviously there are those on both sides with an agenda. And you actually posted that AA&E? You couldn't have believed that so readily? C'mon surely your spidey sense would have kicked in and told you to question the validity.
11 police officers shot.
Rocks thrown at police officers in other protests.
Would it really be that hard to believe?
There is a third agenda... Clicks. Clicks=$$. And if you make the story fantastical enough, you can get lots of clicks. And by the time somebody figures out that crazy thing somebody said wasnt so crazy, (or new) its too late. You already helped put money in the site owner's pocket.
Do yourself a favor. Put Google to work whenever you see one of those fantastical headlines. The last dozen or so times I have done so I found snopes, hoax slayer, etc links right below the bogus clickbait links in the results.
They'll testify against other doctors in mal-practice cases?
File complaints with whomever the file formal complaints about one another?
...a lawyer friend of mine, getting them to go on the record is like pulling teeth.
No, doctors don't rat each other out. (Sooo glad I proofread that, I missed the "r" and hit "e")
I admit that I skipped the last few pages, so apologies if this was covered earlier.
Was listening to the radio over the weekend - talk radio - which I hardly ever do. The commentator (I have no idea who) had an interesting observation: many people think moderate (and liberal) Muslims should do more to denounce the actions of extremists.
By that same logic, there are 2 permutations:
1) should police officers do more to denounce bad shoots?
2) should white people do more to denounce white (mostly police) violence against unarmed black people?
Perhaps a new thread?
Well, some of the officers in Baltimore were black and it didn't stop it there.It would shut the media up, they wouldn't report it, so this could actually work.
Well, some of the officers in Baltimore were black and it didn't stop it there.
No, doctors don't rat each other out. (Sooo glad I proofread that, I missed the "r" and hit "e")
Since statistics show that black and Hispanic officers are more likely to shoot them than a white officer, how is this a solution? Do they feel better about it since it would be black on black violence?
I've seen enough Bull**** in the past few weeks to know that this is true.
Unfortunately, police officers are shoot far too regularly. Rocks have been thrown at police officer's forever. A mass killing of 19 white women with BLM carved into their corpses? yeah, kinda outlandish.
5 killed and 6 wounded is not "regular".
Obviously there are those on both sides with an agenda. And you actually posted that AA&E? You couldn't have believed that so readily? C'mon surely your spidey sense would have kicked in and told you to question the validity.
11 police officers shot.
Rocks thrown at police officers in other protests.
Would it really be that hard to believe?
I thought you unsubscribed. It seems to be there's a strong disagreement between two or more members of the forum. They're not calling each other names. They seem to be respectfully addressing each other's points. I really don't think there's anything wrong with the discussion as long as they continue to respect each other's right to believe differently.
Still no way comparable to 19 people, white women, murdered and mutilated. Not in the same universe.
...surely your spidey sense would have kicked in and told you to question the validity.
I would have to agree with this.