Just food for thought. Deadly force is deadly force, but this is setting a dangerous precedent. Will this become the norm now? Is this the answer to bunkered terrorists? I thought a situation of this nature called for SWAT. It is what they have been trained to handle isn't it? Don't get me wrong. I'm far from being a bleeding heart liberal. It's just a little unnerving that police have now included limited explosives in their arsenal. I'm surprised that they didn't use an armored vehicle to approach and trap the shooter. I do understand that they were concerned about possible explosives, but is the answer to use explosives themselves? Will police now use explosives just because they are concerned any nut job might have explosives?
Although I can respect where you're coming from, I disagree that it's a dangerous precedent. Limited explosives definitely would fall under "special weapons and tactics." Knowing that Dallas PD has a top notch SWAT team I can only surmise that they had information which led them to believe this would be a wise tactic. I doubt we'll see an increase in police blowing people up just because it was used successfully in this case. I guess maybe I don't go for the "slippery slope" argument as much as some people, but I just don't see it happening.
Terrorist's sister
Although I can respect where you're coming from, I disagree that it's a dangerous precedent. Limited explosives definitely would fall under "special weapons and tactics." Knowing that Dallas PD has a top notch SWAT team I can only surmise that they had information which led them to believe this would be a wise tactic. I doubt we'll see an increase in police blowing people up just because it was used successfully in this case. I guess maybe I don't go for the "slippery slope" argument as much as some people, but I just don't see it happening.
Terrorist's sister
Yep; and the saying is worthy. There's an idiot from every village
It takes a village to have an idiot....
...but it takes a TOWN to have a drunk.
That is profound
200 yards with irons is not impressive.
How many rounds did he fire (bet his hit/kill rate was low).
He was shooting large targets, people. Not chipmunks.
200 yards, with irons, at night, elevated position, 12 hits, at human targets.....IS impressive shooting. He's not shooting at cardboard cutouts.
Demonstration/protest happening tomorrow in Indianapolis
Yea verily. Nothing disclosed about rate of fire or target movement. I'd say that is might impressive performance....even though it was evil.
You guys are missing the point. No one is arguing about the disproportionate numbers. I asking if coverage of those numbers is proportionate? Which I do not believe, which presents a skewed narrative. White people are MORE often killed or shot by police. Heck, white people kill police more often. I think we both know that these events aren't covered nearly as thoroughly as when it's a black offender or victim. Are you understanding my point?
The FBI site has a bar graph of murders committed by race. The proportions are astonishing. Tall bar for blacks. Sort of a medium bar for "hispanics/latino". Very low bar for whites and Asians. Also in the statistics, Blacks mostly kill blacks. Whites mostly kill whites. Hispanics/Latinos mostly kill hispanics/latinos. Asians don't really seem to kill that much to say anything about it.
A while back I downloaded the spreadsheet of crime statistics and removed the black on black murders. If we excluded that the murder rate in the US would be comparable to Europe. Blacks have a cultural problem to fix. And I'm not saying that whites haven't been a contributor to that culture. Certainly dependency politics feeds that beast.