The counterargument is that there is a perceived need. You can say there is no actual need, but you cannot deny the perceived need. They said it in the original article you linked to - there are certain situations that they think this will be better than what they currently have.
Does that make it better? No, but we'll find out for sure if it ever gets deployed.
It does establish that the TCSD *thinks* they need it. If they think they need it, and they can afford it without raising taxes, then it becomes a political issue. Argue about priorities, along with other political decisions, in the primaries.
It does seem like a reach to say there's been no counterargument, though.
Does that make it better? No, but we'll find out for sure if it ever gets deployed.
It does establish that the TCSD *thinks* they need it. If they think they need it, and they can afford it without raising taxes, then it becomes a political issue. Argue about priorities, along with other political decisions, in the primaries.
It does seem like a reach to say there's been no counterargument, though.