The Real Costs of Electric Car Ownership - CNET

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,254
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Obviously. And incentives are going to influence where that 'somewhere' is as lots of somewheres, US and foreign, are vying to be that somewhere. Like I said I agree in principal but in reality if you don't engage in corporate welfare via incentives you won't get the jobs that corporate welfare brings. Pragmatically, you can stick to your principals but more "somewheres" will be Mexico, Malaysia, India, etc. or just other states that did pay to play.
    Government costs what it costs. If government gives away tax dollars spent given companies breaks, it's just shifting the cost of government to workers who work for that business. And sure, employees would probably rather have the jobs than the tax money the company should have been paying.

    But, for the sake of employing people in Tennessee vs Oklahoma, or for the sake of employing more people than it would have otherwise, is different thing than for the sake of keeping the jobs in the US rather than in Mexico. I suspect there are other ways to keep jobs here. But we actually have to want to keep jobs here.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    26,608
    113
    Government costs what it costs. If government gives away tax dollars spent given companies breaks, it's just shifting the cost of government to workers who work for that business. And sure, employees would probably rather have the jobs than the tax money the company should have been paying.

    But, for the sake of employing people in Tennessee vs Oklahoma, or for the sake of employing more people than it would have otherwise, is different thing than for the sake of keeping the jobs in the US rather than in Mexico. I suspect there are other ways to keep jobs here. But we actually have to want to keep jobs here.

    Good paying jobs is a pretty solid investment, though. Better than paying to subsidize a walmart via benefits to keep the workers above poverty level and with healthcare, paying to deal with all the crime it brings, etc. Better than paying for a playground for millionaires to draw some tourist dollars for the service industry but mostly for the millionaires/billionaires. Pragmatism says if I'm in Tennessee I want those jobs in Tennessee and to hell with Oklahoma. Let them season their onion heavy burgers with their own tears.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,254
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Good paying jobs is a pretty solid investment, though. Better than paying to subsidize a walmart via benefits to keep the workers above poverty level and with healthcare, paying to deal with all the crime it brings, etc. Better than paying for a playground for millionaires to draw some tourist dollars for the service industry but mostly for the millionaires/billionaires. Pragmatism says if I'm in Tennessee I want those jobs in Tennessee and to hell with Oklahoma. Let them season their onion heavy burgers with their own tears.
    I'm a proponent of pragmatism. But sensible pragmatism. Pragmatism untempered by principle is nothing more than reacting to the whims of every facile cause. There's a balance between principle and pragmatism where if you get it right, then the outcomes are generally good for the most people.

    So Tennessee vs Oklahoma. Both want the employer there. So they try to outbid each other to see who's willing to sell their community out most? Maybe we can find a better way to decide who gets to land the employer.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    26,608
    113
    So Tennessee vs Oklahoma. Both want the employer there. So they try to outbid each other to see who's willing to sell their community out most? Maybe we can find a better way to decide who gets to land the employer.

    Probably. Until then, though, pay to play will continue and will keep big business in a position of advantage with resources smaller entities can't get.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,918
    77
    Porter County
    No doubt that pay to play will continue. Doesn't make it a sound strategy long term.
    It's long term where it does become more sound. Most of these large facilities are not only going to be used for 20 years. I'd be curious to see what the break even point was for that grant and taxes collected.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    26,608
    113
    It's long term where it does become more sound. Most of these large facilities are not only going to be used for 20 years. I'd be curious to see what the break even point was for that grant and taxes collected.

    To see the effect of a major employer on the economic standing of an area, one really just needs to look at factory towns when the factory left. Larger cities with a wide variety of employers aren't as vulnerable of course, but let's take a not-hypothetical of a town built around a canning factory.

    Canning factory paying wages sufficient for middle class families = town with decent schools, low crime, good home values, reasonable school system, etc. Little need for gov't intervention in form of food stamps, providing health care, dealing with blight properties, dealing with high level of crime, etc. Sufficient revenue for the necessities as well as amenities, nice city parks, a library, clean and maintained roads, etc.

    Then the factory begins having issues, does rounds of layoffs, replaces middle class wages with wages for those of questionable immigration status willing to live 6 deep in a one bedroom apartment. Town starts to falter. Loss of tax revenue while increase in demand for services begins a downward spiral.

    Then the factory shuts down and the biggest employer is a Dairy Queen or a gas station. Income is now bottomed out, don't have the money to invest in amenities like parks, can't offer salaries to attract more talented employees to local schools, police depts, etc. Monied residents move to be closer to where they now work or just somewhere 'nicer'. Local economy becomes based on meth and whores. Number of employable residents that would attract a new industry is low. Area stuck at the bottom of death spiral and is now rural blight or a ghost town.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,067
    149
    Indiana


    Summary. We recycle 5% of lithium batteries. The rest are put in landfills and they are wrecking our soil and water supply.
     

    PistolBob

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Oct 6, 2010
    5,434
    83
    Midwest US
    We need nuke powered cars. Buy it once, it has a small reactor, and a fuel pellet that last 15 years. Cost has to be less than 25% of what a house costs. Must come in many colors, and offer a convertible top, a train whistle horn would be nice too.
     

    JCSR

    NO STAGE PLAN
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 11, 2017
    9,959
    133
    Santa Claus


    Summary. We recycle 5% of lithium batteries. The rest are put in landfills and they are wrecking our soil and water supply.
    download (12).gif
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,067
    149
    Indiana

    You mean to tell me that do to the insurance costing more than the car payment per month in Commifornia, they did not have full coverage? How much do they still owe on their shinny/dented ramming machine(what, if I was the jeep and they hit me again after the initial impact I would have left as well)?

    Strange edit of the side video as well. Something seems shaddy.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom