Couldn’t be the possibility of epidemic diseases illegally migrating toward our border. Nah, there’s no reason to try and control the flow.
You mean like the Ebola outbreak currently in the Congo?
Couldn’t be the possibility of epidemic diseases illegally migrating toward our border. Nah, there’s no reason to try and control the flow.
All he has to do, is stop the flow. Instead of encouraging it.
By what metric do you gauge success given the timeframe the president demands?
Maybe the Mexican President can ask that very question.
I don't think it should be on the Mexican government to "stop" the flow, but they damned well should not be encouraging or aiding it in any way.All he has to do, is stop the flow. Instead of encouraging it.
Trump let Democrats in Congress off the hook by a imposing tariffs on Mexico instead of keeping the focus on them.
This is a problem created and propelled by Congressional Democrats that they refuse to deal with.
Maybe he should impose tariffs on thier pay checks and bennies.
Absolutely right.I don't think it should be on the Mexican government to "stop" the flow, but they damned well should not be encouraging or aiding it in any way.
I don't think it should be on the Mexican government to "stop" the flow, but they damned well should not be encouraging or aiding it in any way.
FACT CHECK: Are Terrorists Trying to Cross the U.S. Border Illegally?
https://topstoriesusa.com/fact-check-are-terrorists-trying-to-cross-the-u-s-border-illegally/
15 since 2001? While 1 is too many, 15 in 18 years gets a yawn out of me.
In addition, CIS identified more than 100 other suspicious migrants from Middle Eastern countries with possible ties to radical terrorist groups.
...
These numbers, of course, do not measure radicals who escaped apprehension.
You are missing the forest for the trees.
I suspect the problem is fake documents that employers simply copy for the I-9, making it difficult to impossible to prove intent.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was ordered to quadruple worksite enforcement this year, and it did just that. In fiscal year 2018, which ended Sept. 30, ICE set 10-year highs for the number of worksite audits conducted (5,981) and criminal charges filed (779).
...
The 113 members of management charged with criminal violations in 2018 increased 82 percent from the previous year, but the 666 workers charged with criminal violations increased by 812 percent. The number of "administrative arrests" – those for basic immigration violations that are predominantly used against workers – spiked from 172 in 2017 to 1,525 in 2018. The 121 federal indictments and convictions of managers in 2018 represented a 10-year low for the agency.
Breitbart: Feds: Only 11 Employers Prosecuted for Hiring Illegal Aliens in Last Year
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...cuted-for-hiring-illegal-aliens-in-last-year/
Something doesn't seem right (perhaps it's which statistics are being quoted) as the above article makes employer enforcement efforts seem lax, while the article below, seems the opposite, that ICE workplace investigations are ramping up.
USA Today: Feds targeting more worksites crack down on undocumented workers – but not their employers
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...migration-and-customs-enforcement/2263656002/
I suspect the problem is fake documents that employers simply copy for the I-9, making it difficult to impossible to prove intent.
IMO, the answer is mandatory eVerify!
The problem with eVerify is that too many legislators on either side don’t want it. The open-borders Dems don’t want it. And the chamber-o-commerce Republicans don’t want it.