Yeah...I can get behind gender identity because there is science behind it. We don't understand what a lot of the genes do in the human genome. I've seen some bizarre stuff where kids had too many X or Y chromosomes and ended up physically a boy or girl but mentally the opposite.
I have never seen that on top of acting like a child....
So, when the "old cis white gays" and the christian bigots are silenced and put in their places, I gotta wonder what the next wierdo cause be.
The number of people with "gender identity" issues rooted in actual XXY or XYY mutations is vanishingly small. The overwhelming majority of the people are genetically very clearly male or female.
IMO there is very clearly a "nurture" rather than "nature" element to this. Children growing up in dysfunctional homes with absent or abusive parents (or both) end up with struggles they shouldn't have.
You don't need a statistical T-test to acknowledge that the fraction of people with "issues" that grew up and reasonably functional, two-parent homes where their genetic parents stayed married to each other, is the smallest of tiny fractions of the group.
1) Polygamy, then
2) Pedophilia
Don't count out what is euphemistically called GSA.
Mother 'in love with her son and wants to have his baby' | Home News | News | The Independent
Don't count out what is euphemistically called GSA.
Mother 'in love with her son and wants to have his baby' | Home News | News | The Independent
That story was worthless without pics.
But we need to keep government out of our bedrooms! And Love is Love! And Love Wins! And they are consenting adults, who are we to judge! And if they are happy, good for them!
Also, she read about it on the internet, it must be true!
I think society should think strongly about recognizing certain "exotic" behavior as the mental illness that it is. Would probably go a long way towards settling the issue of privacy matters.
You never struck me as the legislating of morality type.
You never struck me as the legislating of morality type.
You never struck me as the legislating of morality type.
You never struck me as the type miss the moral nature of all law.
Laws should protect rights and provide objective ways to resolve areas where rights collide. Morals are relative.All laws are based on morals. The problem, comes with the fact that different people have different morals. Laws, speaking from a non-religious standpoint, should be based on natural right, which in turn should be based on non-interference. Obviously, for the most part that is a naive suggestion, as a society's identity is often based on its moralities. However, it is in the best interest of everyone to keep a watchful eye on which laws overstep their bounds.