4. His nationalized health care will be better able to respond to pandemics.
[Caveat: this would carry no weight with me, but I could see it appealing to many people.]
Are you just messing with Alpo?
4. His nationalized health care will be better able to respond to pandemics.
[Caveat: this would carry no weight with me, but I could see it appealing to many people.]
FTFY
Biden doesn't need a campaign.
Trump needs a campaign.
DJIA, a sliding GDP and high un-/under-employment. That needs fixing. And a virus cure.
Well, Trump will either be a hero Nov 1....or bear scat.
It's really simple fellas:
If Trump cannot turn the economy back around by November and get people back to work, he will not have a chance of winning this election.
GP: Remember the old line: "Are you better off today than you were before the election of XXX"?
I'm sure Trump had a great story for himself going into November before the corona crisis. It would be hard for almost anyone in the middle class to say they were worse off than 2016 (I generalize a little, of course, so please excuse that). The poor might not feel the same and they probably wouldn't move to a majority voting for republican this time around. But, Trump had pretty much the rich and a good chunk of the middle class fairly happy going into the election.
But....not now. We can go back as far as Jimmy Carter, methinks, when "It's the economy, stupid." is the most important individual characteristic in the minds of voters. I cannot see it changing.
Trump didn't cause the virus, obviously. But no president is "totally" responsible for a good economy or bad economy. It doesn't mean they won't be stapled with it either way.
It's true that the economy is not something that he can currently point to as a success. But he can circle the wagons and point to how well the economy was doing before the CCP and WHO suppressed the data on COVID-19, which prevented the world reducing the cases by 95%. The global economy is suffering because of circumstances outside the control of this Administration. How much that mitigates harm remains to be seen but, don't forget, it was not his party holding the country hostage to force pork into the stimulus package. It isn't his party that said that they are on a break for several weeks. The Democrats own all that.GP: Remember the old line: "Are you better off today than you were before the election of XXX"?
I'm sure Trump had a great story for himself going into November before the corona crisis. It would be hard for almost anyone in the middle class to say they were worse off than 2016 (I generalize a little, of course, so please excuse that). The poor might not feel the same and they probably wouldn't move to a majority voting for republican this time around. But, Trump had pretty much the rich and a good chunk of the middle class fairly happy going into the election.
But....not now. We can go back as far as Jimmy Carter, methinks, when "It's the economy, stupid." is the most important individual characteristic in the minds of voters. I cannot see it changing.
Trump didn't cause the virus, obviously. But no president is "totally" responsible for a good economy or bad economy. It doesn't mean they won't be stapled with it either way.
Alpo has a point. We have almost seven months until the election. That is a lot of time for things to get worse or better. The way things trend will probably have a large say in how the election goes.
Biden's best play is to say little to nothing. Trump has to not say a lot of stupid . Neither one is likely to happen.
The wildcard in all of this may be the House. If they really start beating the impeachment drums again, that may swing things Trump's way. I really can't imagine our population has a stomach for trying to impeach a President that is actively trying to deal with this issue.