indyartisan
Master
Dr Shiva Live: My Testimony in Michigan Hearing Today Exposes the Failure of the DOJ.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9i8m76MrJXA
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9i8m76MrJXA
Interesting. So companies have data retention policies but governments have data deletion policies
I think they are doing the Hillary Clinton thing. Regardless of whether a court order is on the way or already issued, they wipe the memory, shrug, say "all gone" and when you object on legal grounds they ask "WTF are you going to do about it?"
Until we answer "Prison, for a very, very long time," and actually follow through with it, this will be standard operating procedure.
What a joke. After 3 years of Russia, Russia, Russia and an impeachment proceeding based on bought and paid for fake dossiers and illegal FISA warrants with no repercussions for those responsible, they've got a lot of gall to try and paint themselves as victims after one month. Spare me.https://www.yahoo.com/gma/lawyers-keep-pushing-trump-election-100001652.html
\
Good Morning America
As lawyers keep pushing Trump election challenges, calls for sanctions mount
Several legal experts said Powell may be uniquely vulnerable to sanction because of the number of errors in her filings -- some of them egregious. Some of the most troubling, they said, surfaced in an election challenge she brought in federal court in Wisconsin earlier this week.
In the case, Powell asked a Wisconsin judge to order the release of 48 hours of security camera footage from the TCF Center -- but the facility is actually in Michigan.
Oh sure. Sidney is a light in the shining city upon the hill.
Even Joe Bridge Builder, Chris Christie, called her "a national embarassment".
Then what's the harm in letting these go to court? If as they say, the evidence is so flimsy that the defense will be a slam dunk, then let's see it. I'm as frustrated as any with all these promises of evidence to be presented that never come to light. I say let them come to light. Just dismissing them out of hand because the social media fact checkers say so doesn't seem prudent. These judges could have ended this one way or another before now. Hear the cases. Call their hands or fold.Over 45 cases....some filed as high as state supreme courts....and they all lack the basic support necessary for a judge to want to initiate a deeper dive....not to mention spelling errors, jurisdiction errors, and witnesses that testify to such things as "the room was too warm".
Gimme a break. If this is the best the legal profession can offer, then we ought to start that "lawyers at the bottom of the ocean" pile.
When the dust finally settles one thing that will be interesting to watch is the media's response to biden. Are they going to fact check him in real time during his State of the Unions etc. like they did Trump? I don't think it will be a love fest like with obama but I bet the change in the mood of the newsroom will be very evident. Probably the worst thing that could have happened to them is for Trump to lose (good for conservative media though), what are the late night 'comedians' going to talk about or SNL lol.
I want to know how this applies?
Every
officer of election
shall retain and preserve, for a period of twenty-two months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President,
Vice President
, presidential elector, Member of the
Senate
, Member of the
House of Representatives
, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico
are voted for, all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another
officer of election
and except that, if a State or the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico
designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any
officer of election
or custodian who willfully fails to comply with this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20701
Then what's the harm in letting these go to court? If as they say, the evidence is so flimsy that the defense will be a slam dunk, then let's see it. I'm as frustrated as any with all these promises of evidence to be presented that never come to light. I say let them come to light. Just dismissing them out of hand because the social media fact checkers say so doesn't seem prudent. These judges could have ended this one way or another before now. Hear the cases. Call their hands or fold.
I find a lot of this rather funny. The same side who for the past 4 years cried Russia, Russia, Russia and did everything they could to de-legitimize the Trump Presidency is getting just a taste of what they dished out and they don't like it.