You need to change the poll to add the option of " Paul is a loon who means well"
Yeah, what could be crazier than a guy with a forty year record of voting for what the Constitution actually says calling himself a Republican?
You need to change the poll to add the option of " Paul is a loon who means well"
Yeah, what could be crazier than a guy with a forty year record of voting for what the Constitution actually says calling himself a Republican?
How about a loon who think Iran with nukes is a shoulder shrug event.
Not half as funny as you assuming I know less about the Bible than you do. If I've studied Al Qur'an, and I have, you can pretty well bet I've studied the Bible too.
So what did you think was supposed to happen when one turns the other cheek? If there's any truth to the Bible they're in Heaven right now. Why, if one really believed, would one not turn the other cheek and accept the opportunity to be called home? Seems to me the ones who don't turn the other cheek, who draw their sword and slice off that ear, are the ones who really don't believe.
Did he not say "Bad Simon Peter" (I paraphrase, of course), then make him put up his sword? Did he not replace the ear? Did he not refuse to defend against what was to come? Did he not refuse to allow them to defend him from what was to come? How can you ignore such an obvious lesson? (Patiently awaiting an amusing rationalization, assuming the Mods will let this growing breech of the rules slide.)
Blame it on the FBI. It's a summary of their statistics. Which, by the way, neither steveh_131 nor I created.
You poor thing. Just because I believe in what the USA used to stand for does not make me a Muslim sympathizer. It makes me an actual conservative, as compared with a Conservative In Name Only.
You didn't refute mine either. Yes, some Muslims do bad things, I've never argued otherwise. So do some people who call themselves Christians, a point you seem uncomfortable with. None the less, according to the FBI (you should try actually reading the sourced material) Muslims are a small part of the total problem. The vast majority of Muslims are as peaceful as the vast majority of Christians. Well, the Christians who turn the other cheek as they were told, anyway. The ones with swords, maybe not so much.
How about a loon who think Iran with nukes is a shoulder shrug event.
As I read it, it applies only to "attacks on American soil".
What about all the attacks on our troops, embassies, civilians, interests, and allies in all the other countries...... where Americans have been targeted???
Other than a fabricated pie chart, none of you muslim sympathizers has been able to refute one of my stated facts.
As I read it, it applies only to "attacks on American soil".
What about all the attacks on our troops, embassies, civilians, interests, and allies in all the other countries...... where Americans have been targeted???
Do the research and add up the numbers and see if it comes out to 99.9% as previously asserted.
I never said, that I agreed with the 99.9% figure......... did I!?
However, my point was....... she stated "99.9% of terrorist attacks". She never said "on U.S. soil"...... did she!? The FBI stats, and your pie chart..... are based on "attacks on U.S. soil". Read your own link.
I never said, that I agreed with the 99.9% figure......... did I!?
However, my point was....... she stated "99.9% of terrorist attacks". She never said "on U.S. soil"...... did she!? The FBI stats, and your pie chart..... are based on "attacks on U.S. soil". Read your own link.
You and BitterClinger should buy this book. It would be a good start.
To get close to 99% whoever's making the claim needs to come up with over 4300 attacks outside of the US and its protectorates, all committed by Muslims. Any acts committed by non-Muslims will drive the required number up. (Not saying you agreed with that number, but...)
That's right. I said I never agreed with the number 99.9%.....
Oh, and attacks on our troops don't count because we're at sorta-war. Attacks against Israel also don't count - war.
Not half as funny as you assuming I know less about the Bible than you do. If I've studied Al Qur'an, and I have, you can pretty well bet I've studied the Bible too.
So what did you think was supposed to happen when one turns the other cheek? If there's any truth to the Bible they're in Heaven right now. Why, if one really believed, would one not turn the other cheek and accept the opportunity to be called home? Seems to me the ones who don't turn the other cheek, who draw their sword and slice off that ear, are the ones who really don't believe.
Did he not say "Bad Simon Peter" (I paraphrase, of course), then make him put up his sword? Did he not replace the ear? Did he not refuse to defend against what was to come? Did he not refuse to allow them to defend him from what was to come? How can you ignore such an obvious lesson? (Patiently awaiting an amusing rationalization, assuming the Mods will let this growing breech of the rules slide.)
Blame it on the FBI. It's a summary of their statistics. Which, by the way, neither steveh_131 nor I created.
You poor thing. Just because I believe in what the USA used to stand for does not make me a Muslim sympathizer. It makes me an actual conservative, as compared with a Conservative In Name Only.
You didn't refute mine either. Yes, some Muslims do bad things, I've never argued otherwise. So do some people who call themselves Christians, a point you seem uncomfortable with. None the less, according to the FBI (you should try actually reading the sourced material) Muslims are a small part of the total problem. The vast majority of Muslims are as peaceful as the vast majority of Christians. Well, the Christians who turn the other cheek as they were told, anyway. The ones with swords, maybe not so much.
You and BitterClinger should buy this book. It would be a good start.
Yep. Muslims did horrible things in Norway.
You're a funny guy. Guess you didn't know one of my degrees is in mathematics.
On the internet, everyone has at least one degree in mathematics.
I've read quite a few of your posts, sir........ and you seem to me like a reasonable and intelligent guy.
So, why this 'cheap shot' post?