Fair enough (although Johnson was the only candidate to have the nuts to say this after the Colorado shooting "“If we’re going to ban weapons, the people that will have weapons will be criminals,” the former New Mexico governor added. “It’s not legal to have tear gas, and this guy had tear gas. So laws don’t prevent criminals from conducting their activity. It’s law-abiding citizens that in this case, if just someone would have been armed in that theater, perhaps they could have brought this tragedy to an end or made it less of a tragedy than it was.”).
Based on your stated positions, Johnson probably isn't the candidate for you. I have the utmost respect for your position because you are voting based on your beliefs and values, not just because "he's electable and the lesser of two evils".
That being said, I myself don't see much changing if he gets elected to office, and I don't see a stop on the assault of the Constitution either.
And I can honestly say, that if the tables were turned, and Johnson were more electable than Romney, based on what I read on his site, I do not know that I could bring myself to vote for him. This is the position that you and others here hold. I respect that, and I understand that.
If this were the case, I'd rather have Pres. Obama than Johnson, and would likely abstain if those were my only choices. I see that what I'm asking you to do is not something you could ever agree to. I get that, I truly do.