Re-Elect the President?

[Hotdoger]

You can order t-bones all you want, but it ain't on the menu!

It is on the wet dreamers menu.

 

[lashicoN]

And yours, dishonest.

Thanks for sharing.

How so?

You made a blanket statement that a vote for Johnson (anyone other than Romney) is a vote for Obama. Based on the "study" you told us about, you seem to believe if Johnson wasn't on the ballot, then the Johnson voter would vote for Romney. That follows no logic whatsoever, and I backed my statement up with a real life example. When I vote third party, it is because I want to vote third party and/or don't want to vote for EITHER of the other two parties. I gave you the example that if I hadn't voted third party, neither other party would have received that vote instead, leaving their final vote counts unaltered.

If even one person makes your statement false, which I just did, then your statement is false. I'm saying the person with the most votes won because they got the most votes. You're saying the person with the most votes won because the rest of the voters didn't all line up behind the second guy, who didn't get as many votes as the first guy on his own. So who, again, is being dishonest?

 

[KJQ6945]

Since we're going with food analogies.

I'm going to taco bell, what's everybody want?
According to the poll results; 193 people want something that they think they can hold down. 15 people want to throw up. And apparently there is a group that will screw everybody else if they can't have t-bone steak.

 

[TopDog]

I propose the 15 people that voted yes up to this point be banned from INGO forever and perhaps deported.

 

[hornadylnl]

Since we're going with food analogies.

I'm going to taco bell, what's everybody want?
According to the poll results; 193 people want something that they think they can hold down. 15 people want to throw up. And apparently there is a group that will screw everybody else if they can't have t-bone steak.

And those who voted for Romney in the primary didn't screw the pro liberty group?

 

[lashicoN]

It is on the wet dreamers menu.

It's also on the menu for everyone who lives in reality land.

United States presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The thing is, at this restaurant, whatever the majority votes, we all have to eat. But to say that we only have two choices is simply incorrect.

 

[KJQ6945]

I propose the 15 people that voted yes up to this point be banned from INGO forever and perhaps deported.

I'm amazed at the liberals who profess to be gun enthusiasts. What's next, polar bears in favor of global warming?

 

[KJQ6945]

And those who voted for Romney in the primary didn't screw the pro liberty group?

Your right we screwed both of them.

All conservatives, constitutionalists, republicans, libertarians and any other
non-communists should just vote for Ronald Reagan (or any other make believe candidate) and then we can all sit around and b**ch when we end up with a socialist horses *ss.

 

[LEaSH]

I'm amazed at the romney supporters who profess to be gun enthusiasts. What's next...

 

[KJQ6945]

I'm amazed at the romney supporters who profess to be gun enthusiasts. What's next...

Freedom! Welcome aboard and thanks for asking.

 

[LEaSH]

You're a funny guy, KJQ. I hope you can keep us laughing after November.

 

[No2rdame]

I think the results of this poll have officially put all of INGO on the double secret top hush hush watch list. They'll probably have hackers break in to find as much personal detail about each of us as possible.

Needless to say my vote last time didn't go to the winner, let's hope this time around I vote on the winning side.

 

[KJQ6945]

You're a funny guy, KJQ. I hope you can keep us laughing after November.

It's all in fun leash, I think we all have guns and want to keep them and be able to enjoy them. Like I said earlier, I'm not a Romney fan boy. I'm for truth, freedom (justice) and the American way, period. Superman isn't in this election, so everybody needs to decide who best represents their beliefs. BUT, decisions have consequences. The libertarian, Johnson, doesn't stand a chance in hell. Even the HANDFUL of people that are going to vote for him know it. They're going to cut their nose off to spite their face.

Obama is hell bent to destroy this country and everything it stands for. A second term for him and he will accomplish his goals, at our expense.

That only leaves one choice. He's not a dream candidate, but he doesn't scare the hell out of me either. He is the only electable "conservative" in the race.

Please feel free to just imagine most of my posts in purple if it would offend you less.

 

[ditto]

Now that's funny!

Ditto, by the way.

Did someone call me?

OP - are you nuts? Do you have any idea the can of savage bloodthirsty worms you've just unleashed?

 

[ditto]

Please feel free to just imagine most of my posts in purple if it would offend you less.

Purple text is for the weak. Real men use pink.

 

[Ted]

......my statement, which was your statement reworded, sounds pretty retarded.

.......

Mischaracterizing one's statement to change its meaning is inherently dishonest. If you don't recognize that, you're much further gone than anyone else anticipated.

 

[lashicoN]

Mischaracterizing one's statement to change its meaning is inherently dishonest. If you don't recognize that, you're much further gone than anyone else anticipated.

Your original statement was that a vote for anyone other than Romney is, in fact, a vote FOR Obama.

My statement was, if I chose any drink other than Coca-Cola then that is, in fact, a choice favoring Pepsi, even though I chose water in reality, which clearly, in no way whatsoever, supports Pepsi, since it's water from my faucet.

The meaning of the statement wasn't changed at all. What you are saying is that, between choice A, B, and C, choosing anything other than B is actually choosing A, which isn't only dishonest, it's idiotic, since one is still able to choose C without choosing A. Clearly, even to someone named Ted, I have now demonstrated that your statement is false and illogical. You're getting caught up in the emotions of politics. I'm showing you math.

I even used representative colors in my rewording. Pepsi Blue for Obama, Coca-Cola red for Romney, and clear water for Johnson, because no one can tell he's even there.

 

[Hotdoger]

It's also on the menu for everyone who lives in reality land.

United States presidential election, 2012 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The thing is, at this restaurant, whatever the majority votes, we all have to eat. But to say that we only have two choices is simply incorrect.

Fantasy menus are important only to the wet dreamers.

 

[PistolBob]

Let me throw this out there:

The race is between Obama and Romney. Period.

Gary Johnson, may be a worthy opponent, but he does not have the $$$ machinery in place to win a presidential election in 2012.l Like it or not, money is power in an election like this. If you can't raise the funds on a NFL level then you're just pissing in the wind.

The two major parties will spend over 100 billion dollars on this election.

For a job that pays what? $450,000.00 a year?

So what's the real prize? If supporters are spending 100 Billion Dollars, what are they buying? (purely rhetorical)

Obama doesn't deserve a second chance, his failures in Afghanistan, the economy, trade, the military, and all fronts will be seen as epic failures in the history of the United States. We've had two of the very worst congressional bodies coupled with a weak president over the last four years, it's going to take some time to recover. Romney is the only feasible way we have to at least slow down the process.

 

[ATOMonkey]

If everyone wasn't so scared of losing, I guarantee a Johnson win.

As it happens, people are more worried about what they might lose, than they are optimistic about what they might gain.

Sad world...