Re-Elect the President?

[Classic Liberal]

So there is no real excuse to not vote for Romney, is there?

There is no real reason to vote for Romney and my reasons to not vote for him are not excuses, they are legitimate.

 

[Ted]

There is no real reason to vote for Romney and my reasons to not vote for him are not excuses, they are legitimate.

You don't get it and you'll never get it.

You're so full of hate for Romney, that you're willing to give the presidency back to the Socialist/Kenyan/Muslim/Racist.

 

[Classic Liberal]

You don't get it and you'll never get it.

You're so full of hate for Romney, that you're willing to give the presidency back to the Socialist/Kenyan/Muslim/Racist.

Actually, I get it quite well. You however, are willing to vote for one oppressionist to flush out another. I see no benefit to this.

If Romney had a platform of reducing government and getting them out of our personal lives, he'd get my vote in a heartbeat, but he will not, therefore, I will not.

 

[Kutnupe14]

You don't get it and you'll never get it.

You're so full of hate for Romney, that you're willing to give the presidency back to the Socialist/Kenyan/Muslim/Racist.

Your intolerance saddens me...

 

[Ted]

Actually, I get it quite well. You however, are willing to vote for one oppressionist to flush out another. I see no benefit to this.

If Romney had a platform of reducing government and getting them out of our personal lives, he'd get my vote in a heartbeat, but he will not, therefore, I will not.

Using your logic, because Romney doesn't deserve to be president......Obama, by default, does deserve a second term.

You might as well just cast your ballot for Obama.

Your intolerance saddens me...

 

[CPT Nervous]

For once, I agree with Ted, and disagree with Classic Liberal.

Romney will be infinitely better than Dear Leader.

Why would so many people rather see a second Obama term than vote for Romney?

 

[HeadlessRoland]

If we can kick him out and keep him out then we're fine.
If we kick him out and he comes back in 2016 or 2020 then we're in even worse condition then. Anyone think an amendment limiting the President to one four-year term would be ripe for consideration in the Congress?

 

[NYFelon]

As there is no bacon option, I must boycott this poll on GP.

 

[2A_Tom]

Lib,

You can think of reasons for not voting for Romney, but yuo can think of no reason not to Obama a second term?

You have two choices for dinner, dog food , or a c***pie. You choose the t bone steak, and end up with the c***pie. Happy?

 

[KJQ6945]

Romney will be infinitely better than Dear Leader.

Why would so many people rather see a second Obama term than vote for Romney?

I agree 100%
All of these third party voters could give Barry another four years. I'm not in love with Romney by any stretch of the imagination. I'll take him over Obama any day of the week. Ross Perot got Clinton elected more than Clinton did.

If Barry gets another four years we might as well rename this place "Former Indiana Gun Owners". We can all talk about the good old days when we HAD guns or could afford to buy ammo to shoot them.

I'll swallow a little and vote for Romney, at least that way I'm guaranteed the chance to vote again in 2016.

 

[lashicoN]

Its not as history hasn't provided enough proof that a third party candidate has changed presidential elections. Ralph Nadar, Ross Perot, and Theodore Roosevelt are just 3 examples within the last 100 years.

Extrapolating from the current polls, a vote for anyone other than Romney (despite feeling personally dirty for doing so), is a vote for Obama.

That isn't proof of your claim, at all. Why are people voting third party? Because they don't want to vote for the other two parties, pretty simple. In the cases where I've voted third party, if there wasn't a third party on the ballot, neither of the other two parties still would have received that vote. Their totals would have remained exactly the same. I imagine many people who vote third party would do this as well, which is why they're voting third party to begin with.

A vote for Obama is the only vote for Obama. A lot of this country doesn't vote. If Romney gets fewer votes than Obama, then there simply weren't enough people who wanted to vote for Romney. No other excuses in reality.

Your claim is equal to this scenario.

Before me, I have three choices. Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and water. I chose to drink water. So did I really choose Pepsi because I didn't choose Coke? Sounds pretty retarded, doesn't it?

 

[bmbutch]

I don't know whether Romney or Obama will benefit the most from 3rd party voters but I'm sure my vote for Romney will not benefit Obama. 'Nuff said!

^^^^This^^^^

 

[bass pro]

NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! I cant take 4 more years of not knowing if I will have a job the next day. And I work for a union.

 

[Classic Liberal]

Using your logic, because Romney doesn't deserve to be president......Obama, by default, does deserve a second term.

You might as well just cast your ballot for Obama.

Your view of my logic is quite flawed. Obama does not deserve a second term, nor does Romney deserve a first.

 

[Ted]

That isn't proof of your claim, at all. Why are people voting third party? Because they don't want to vote for the other two parties, pretty simple. In the cases where I've voted third party, if there wasn't a third party on the ballot, neither of the other two parties still would have received that vote. Their totals would have remained exactly the same. I imagine many people who vote third party would do this as well, which is why they're voting third party to begin with.

A vote for Obama is the only vote for Obama. A lot of this country doesn't vote. If Romney gets fewer votes than Obama, then there simply weren't enough people who wanted to vote for Romney. No other excuses in reality.

Your claim is equal to this scenario.

Before me, I have three choices. Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and water. I chose to drink water. So did I really choose Pepsi because I didn't choose Coke? Sounds pretty retarded, doesn't it?

I am aware of one post-election study which concludes that a majority of voters in Florida that voted for Ralph Nadar in the 2000 election, would have voted for Al Gore, if there hadn't been the choice.

While merely speculation, its a fair bet that Roosevelt split the vote between him and Taft, leaving Wilson the victor.

Was a vote for Roosevelt, only a vote for Roosevelt, or did it result in Wilson with a majority of the vote? Was a vote for Nadar in Florida, only a vote for Nadar, or did it result in Bush with a majority of the vote in Florida?

Your logic concludes that Gore and Taft both lost, because neither garnered enough votes. True enough, but that statement that disregards the split in votes, is akin to stating that the leading cause of divorce is marriage.

So yes, your statement does sound pretty retarded.

 

[Ted]

Your view of my logic is quite flawed. Obama does not deserve a second term, nor does Romney deserve a first.

BHO recognizes that you would never vote for him, so a vote for anyone else but Romney is doing BHO the favor.

Its clear you don't understand the concept, so good luck with your dogma.

 

[Classic Liberal]

Lib,

You can think of reasons for not voting for Romney, but yuo can think of no reason not to Obama a second term?

You have two choices for dinner, dog food , or a c***pie. You choose the t bone steak, and end up with the c***pie. Happy?

I have more reasons than I care to list why either one will not get my vote.

It looks to me that the Republican party and those supporting Romney are simply building up a case why they lost the election. Don't blame us...blame your candidate for not appealing to us. Obama and Romney are both cockpie.

Why don't you like t-bone steak?

 

[lashicoN]

While merely speculation...

So yes, your statement does sound pretty retarded.

Cool, we agree that you are merely speculating and my statement, which was your statement reworded, sounds pretty retarded.

 

[KJQ6945]

You can order t-bones all you want, but it ain't on the menu!

 

[Ted]

Cool, we agree that you are merely speculating and my statement, which was your statement reworded, sounds pretty retarded.

And yours, dishonest.

Thanks for sharing.