Mueller report delivered

[printcraft]

On the reverse of that coin, the former AG Jeff Sessions did a pretty damn good job (from the conservative standpoint) at everything but.....? That but is what sent him packing. The new AG walks in after having written a very well known piece about the a president's culpability and the possibility of him being indicted. He is then tapped to be AG. Once he's AG, and Mueller investigation concludes, he takes it upon himself to summarize 400 pages into 4; while ignoring the summaries written by the actual investigators. So, I'll just wait until the report is released (like it was with Clinton) to determine if the investigation was warranted or not.

 

[Doug]

 

[Alpo]

Kut is correct. Today is not any different that 2 years ago when Mueller began the investigation. Until a report is available to be read, there isn't anything to debate. It's all speculation with no basis.

 

[Mongo59]

But before getting the report we need to decide what our definition of "is" is...

 

[KG1]

Kut is correct. Today is not any different that 2 years ago when Mueller began the investigation. Until a report is available to be read, there isn't anything to debate. It's all speculation with no basis.

Ingo without speculation....

 

[BigBoxaJunk]

Kut is correct. Today is not any different that 2 years ago when Mueller began the investigation. Until a report is available to be read, there isn't anything to debate. It's all speculation with no basis.

I still remember listening to conservative talk radio when Bill Clinton was running for re-election. The guy was saying that it'd be a shame if Clinton got elected, only to be indicted when the Starr report was released. If Clinton hadn't done them a solid by diddling an intern, they'd have gotten nothing for their money, but even so, no indictment.

I expect the same this time. Anyway, the whole point of both investigations wasn't the outcome, it's the years of distraction. Impeachment or indictment is just gravy.

 

[Alpo]

Well, the democrats are doing their best to make sure Trump gets re-elected with all the talk of "reparations". There isn't a real democrat left who isn't disgusted with the party.

A pox on them.

 

[printcraft]

 

[2A_Tom]

There IS a difference between now and two years ago.

Two years ago the Libprogocrats knew without a doubt that Trump would be indicted.

Since Mueller completed his investigation with no indictment and a statement that there was no evidence for an indictment, yes, that is a BIG difference.

 

[KG1]

There IS a difference between now and two years ago.

Two years ago the Libprogocrats knew without a doubt that Trump would be indicted.

Since Mueller completed his investigation with no indictment and a statement that there was no evidence for an indictment, yes, that is a BIG difference.

One thing that we do know for sure without speculating before reading the full report was that there weren’t any indictments for “collusion” that came out of the investigation.

 

[printcraft]

One thing that we do know for sure without speculating before reading the full report was that there weren’t any indictments for “collusion” that came out of the investigation.

Yep and you can't obstruct when the thing you are supposed to be obstructing never happened in the first place.

Mueller said himself there was no attempt to block his access.

If there was A N Y T H I N G remotely "collusion" it would have been leaked and you would never hear the end of it.

Sorry kids. You bet the farm on this and you lost.

 

[Expat]

Reportedly Mueller and his good friend Barr are working together on the redactions. That doesn't sound like a situation where Barr misrepresented anything in his little summary report.

 

[KLB]

Reportedly Mueller and his good friend Barr are working together on the redactions. That doesn't sound like a situation where Barr misrepresented anything in his little summary report.

I know Kut ignored my reply to him, but again, if Barr had misrepresented things in his report, I would think Mueller would have been out saying so.

It's always easier to believe unnamed sources that agree with your world view though than accept the obvious.

 

[ghitch75]

Until the report is delivered for eyes the see, it's hard to get past the optics of the president's hand picked AG producing a memo that is favorable to him. It looks even worse, now that we know that Mueller's team actually completed summaries, meant for release, that weren't used.

On the reverse of that coin, the former AG Jeff Sessions did a pretty damn good job (from the conservative standpoint) at everything but.....? That but is what sent him packing. The new AG walks in after having written a very well known piece about the a president's culpability and the possibility of him being indicted. He is then tapped to be AG. Once he's AG, and Mueller investigation concludes, he takes it upon himself to summarize 400 pages into 4; while ignoring the summaries written by the actual investigators. So, I'll just wait until the report is released (like it was with Clinton) to determine if the investigation was warranted or not.

Kut is correct. Today is not any different that 2 years ago when Mueller began the investigation. Until a report is available to be read, there isn't anything to debate. It's all speculation with no basis.

 

[SheepDog4Life]

Kut is correct. Today is not any different that 2 years ago when Mueller began the investigation. Until a report is available to be read, there isn't anything to debate. It's all speculation with no basis.

That's not accurate.... Mueller neither returned, nor recommended, indictments on either collusion or obstruction.

 

[Doug]

We do not have 24/7/365 video surveillance of Trump from birth until the present day.
Therefore, we do not have proof he did not collude and/or obstruct.
Therefore, since there is no proof he is innocent, he is guilty.


Such is the reasoning of the liberal-media complex.

 

[MCgrease08]

One thing that we do know for sure without speculating before reading the full report was that there weren’t any indictments for “collusion” that came out of the investigation.

One would think Americans would be relieved, happy, excited that the president didn't collude with a foreign power to influence an election. Sadly this is not the case with most Democrats. They seem saddened by it.

Weird.

 

[KG1]

One would think Americans would be relieved, happy, excited that the president didn't collude with a foreign power to influence an election. Sadly this is not the case with most Democrats. They seem saddened by it.

Weird.

Exactly. You can tell by thier reaction that they just don’t like Trump and they are desperately looking for any reason to get rid of him.

A lot of political hack Democrat politicians and leftist media sold them a bogus bill of goods and got them all worked up for a major let down.

You would think they might be peeved about that but they are more ticked off that there was no collusion.

 

[Doug]

"Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven."

Democrats cannot be happy unless they are in power.

 

[Alpo]

That's not accurate.... Mueller neither returned, nor recommended, indictments on either collusion or obstruction.

What we have is a delivered report with no knowlege of what IS in it. We think we know what is NOT in it. That isn't a basis for everyone here to thump their chests and make fun of the opposition. And it isn't a basis for the opposition to make wild claims and accusations.

I will await the published report. Pretty much what I said a long time ago and didn't bother to waste electrons here speculating about it.