Ok,since this is America....this Yeager guy is entitled to his opinion,just as we all are....I don't have to agree with it,and I don't....Glocks are fine,reliable weapons,but personally I much prefer a 1911.......and my opinion is that if Glocks are "all that and a bag of chips" why doesn't the military use them instead of the Beretta M-9..even some of the special forces teams use 1911's,and to the best of my knowledge,none of them use Glocks,either(if I'm misinformed, let me know)..........I have my own opinions about Yeager as well,but I'll keep them to myself,to save scutter,et al,the trouble of editing.......as always folks,this is just my ,feel free to agree or disagree...it's all good
so with thinking... the M9 is a superior handgun to the 1911? Since, you know, the Army chose to go that route...
I was in during that transition, and not many thought it was a good choice. But then again, not everyone carried one, except Officers, tankers, MP's. Rifles are far more important to soldiers.
and yup, you are misinformed, some Army SF guys are using Glock 19's downrange and even though they still learn the 1911 in the USSOCOM Joint Armorers course, they don't actively carry them.