Why is this so hard to understand?
No, we can't practically legally punish relatives for boinking each other, but we also don't need the state to call their perversion a marriage.
But let someone like me say that, and I am either some kind of nut, a stick in the mud, or phony conservative.
What's up is down, and what's down is up.
Control. If they regulate it then they control it.I understand perfectly. Denying them a license makes you FEEL better.
What is the state's interest in calling anything a marriage?
I understand perfectly. Denying them a license makes you FEEL better.
What is the state's interest in calling anything a marriage?
Control. If they regulate it then they control it.
I don't care what consenting adults do to one another. The great news is that this is the first step in a long road where small business owners get sued for refusing to bake cakes that say "I'm banging my sister", we get to hear news stories about how Sibling Boinkers of America are rallying for special privileges and the politicians can ignore important topics and focus on how special this newly created special interest group gets to be . Can we at least get the incest pride parade combined with the other pride parades that we'll all be forced to attend while smiling and waiving? I'd prefer not to have to try to find a place to park downtown all that often.
I don't care what consenting adults do to one another. The great news is that this is the first step in a long road where small business owners get sued for refusing to bake cakes that say "I'm banging my sister", we get to hear news stories about how Sibling Boinkers of America are rallying for special privileges and the politicians can ignore important topics and focus on how special this newly created special interest group gets to be . Can we at least get the incest pride parade combined with the other pride parades that we'll all be forced to attend while smiling and waiving? I'd prefer not to have to try to find a place to park downtown all that often.
Where was the outcry when heterosexual couples called for the special privileges that came when government recognized marriage?
I'm all for getting government out of the marriage business. Can those who oppose non traditional marriage say the same? No, their answer is more government.
Where was the outcry when heterosexual couples called for the special privileges that came when government recognized marriage?
I'm all for getting government out of the marriage business. Can those who oppose non traditional marriage say the same? No, their answer is more government.
And from what I've witnessed here on INGO, those whom support non-traditional marriage support more government as well.
And from what I've witnessed here on INGO, those whom support non-traditional marriage support more government as well.
Do we oppose interracial marriage on the grounds that it was an expansion of government?
I oppose the courts making what amounts to constitutional amendments on things that should be left to the people and the states.
After all, the small government conservative rallying cry here is to prevent special privileges or groups. If the government shouldn't be able to force me to bake a cake, they shouldn't be able to force me to provide a close parking space for a 400 pound fatass too lazy to walk.
Yes.Do you oppose the ADA which requires accommodations be made for the disabled on the grounds that it was an expansion of government?