You had me at "repeal".
Just sent another round of emails to my Indiana legislators.
You had me at "repeal".
Without RAS of an infraction or ordinance violation or RABCOS, any LEO's demand for ID may be freely rebuffed without threat of further adverse action.
You have no rights on the side of the road. ( especially while looking down the barrel of a duty weapon). You do, however, have the possibility of the court ruling that your rights have been violated.
Do I have any rights in my own backyard? Just curious.
So...they have to give you the right to remain silent?!?!?!
What kind of tool was that he used?
Halligan. It's generally only used by firefighters to break into burning buildings.What kind of tool was that he used?
If you are a JBT yes.Not something you would wear on your duty belt.
The JBTs had RAS for their action. See my PM since I'm not going to get an infraction/ban for it.
^This
While strictly true, they are not allowed to coerce the production of identifying information, nor are they allowed to exercise excessive force in removing a person from the vehicle. Making the removal from the vehicle ostensibly predicated on the lawful refusal to ID self of a vehicular passenger would seem to me to immediately jump any such removal of the passenger which involved any level of force from the LEOs into the excessive realm. Refusal to consent where consent is clearly not coercible under the law (Starr) cannot be allowed to be used to escalate a LEO's use of force.
Without RAS of an infraction or ordinance violation or RABCOS, any LEO's demand for ID may be freely rebuffed without threat of further adverse action.
"...unproffessionally short skirt..."?!? Where???
They said they were writing a ticket to the passenger as well.