In France They Punch White Girls

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    public servant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Actually...I'm done here. I'll leave any further discussion concerning the issue to the good people of INGO. While I wish I could sway the opinion of NHV...I know I won't. Nor will he sway mine.

    I'm German-Irish by heritage. I also have deep roots in the fire-service...formally having been a fireman. So of course I'm proud of my Irish heritage. I don't however believe that anyone with white skin and bright eyes is any better than someone with dark skin and/or dark eyes.

    I tend to judge people by their character, moral values and work ethic. By what's in their heart rather than from where their forefathers came.

    These thoughts are however...simply my :twocents:.
     

    Benny

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 66.7%
    2   1   0
    May 20, 2008
    21,037
    38
    Drinking your milkshake
    don't you toy with us, we know you have laptops in the car

    fail-owned-police-fail.jpg



    :D

    :rofl:



    BTW, WTF is a "sheboon?" That's a new one to me.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    Public Servant, we dont have to agree on any issues, even though Im positive we agree on many thing's.

    If you want this public, then atleast do me the honor of attempting to go after my opinion and not my being.

    BTW, Im not a supremacist, I dont believe skin trait, eye or hair define the person.
    However, it's obvious that we can look at Europe, America, Canada, Austerilia, South Africa and Eurasia and see the impacts, compared to South America, Pre Columbian North America, and Africa.

    Race is a fact of life.

    I am not who I am for any hatred. I am who I am because I have the ability to read through the pc liberal jargon, and brother I'll admit it is scary.
    I am who I am for the love of my children, and my people.

    Why this is so taboo amongst Whites, I dont know. But again, every other ethnicity can have they're Pro-Racial group and NONE OF THEM ARE ATTACKED except Pro White groups; They could be saying the exact samething, and infact, if you ever desire.. I'll show you every other Race of people say thing's exactly the same as I do, but are NEVER attacked for it.

    It's double standards.


    If you judge "people" by they're moral values, character and work ethic.

    Do you support entitlement programs/politic's? Criminal behavior? Lazy rotten leeching people?

    You tell me why a Black man in Compton has more in common, with a Black African immigrant in Europe, than a White American.


    Both men are incredibly violent, both devalue the area they reside, both support communist "entitlement programs" etc..

    Sorry, but I dont accept politically correct communist crap, other than the properganda is was designed to do; Similar to the crap Im always hearing about being Anti-Gun.

    What is the demographic population of the area you reside. I have one mainly White residential area, and one mainly black in the inner city of Indpls.

    One is very peaceful, the other is a practical warzone, Im seen firefights break out between rival gangs a block away, same street.

    Alot of the politically correct jargon doesnt hold up in the real world. You can be as nancy as you want to be, but simple fact is, if you are White in the area which is mainly black, you are likely to get hassled with, simply because you are White, you are a 'politically correct' best target of opportunity.

    Go to Africa, or read about it.. There is a boer genocide going on right now... thousands of White South Afrikkans, whose ancestors settled Africa are being killed, women, kids, men.

    Black Albinos are killed for the White of they're skin in Africa.

    albino_black.jpg




    In Africa, they have NO WHITES ALLOWED LAWS.

    These are the facts.

    I didnt honest wish to engage this crap in public, but it's becoming appearant that I am being asked to explain myself.

    I've given you, Public Servant, more than enough information for you to sit and shake a stick at; say what you will, facts of life wont change, brother.

    With that, I do respect your opinion to your believe, and it was never my intentions to 'convert'. By the comments here, there is no one to convert:laugh: I do wish to offer my opinion, and if this offends you, dont read my posts :)



    DEAL?:dunno:
     

    groovatron

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Oct 9, 2009
    3,270
    38
    calumet township
    This is a public forum. It is directly linked to the internet. Everything contained within the internet is at our disposal...........including members track records. When one spends a majority of their time surfin' and posting on the web, they automatically accept the terms and conditions. Whining about people bringing a members previous forum postings, blogs, or youtube videos into a thread is ridiculous. The internet is a giant free-for-all, and that's what makes it great. It is a virtual free society.

    @NordicHeathenVinlander

    It saddens me to see a person so caught up in their own insecurity and confusion that they cannot even be honest with themselves. It appears as though your intellect has much potential and your passion and capacity to absorb is at a high level. Unfortunately, you have a very visible trail on the internet that screams racism. You have said some extremely harsh and ignorant things. Many folks on INGO may be fine with ignoring it and moving on, but some of us won't. If you continue to play the soft supremecist, I will poke you with a stick every chance I get.

    And no, I will not take it to a PM. This is a public forum..................PM's are for friends and family.:ingo:
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    @NordicHeathenVinlander

    It saddens me to see a person so caught up in their own insecurity and confusion that they cannot even be honest with themselves. It appears as though your intellect has much potential and your passion and capacity to absorb is at a high level. Unfortunately, you have a very visible trail on the internet that screams racism. You have said some extremely harsh and ignorant things. Many folks on INGO may be fine with ignoring it and moving on, but some of us won't. If you continue to play the soft supremecist, I will poke you with a stick every chance I get.

    And no, I will not take it to a PM. This is a public forum..................PM's are for friends and family.:ingo:


    Brother, thank you for the wonderful comments, I do appreciate the nice thing's you have said. I respect your opinion, and desire even though I may not agree with your choice.

    I understand your Crusade, being what you precieve to be your foe. As I've said, been there done it. I can assure you, I am anything but insecure or confused about my beliefs, and if they are wrong, then I'd never want to be right.

    I also understand your comment about PMs.

    Frith
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    Jclark, they are African Albinos..... Pure Black in DNA, but for some odd reason are with blonde hair, colored eyes and blonde hair. They're skeletal structure is obviously 100% African.

    And since Im being called out, I figure I might include this INGO post from another section (Break room).

    Pretty much disproves alot of communist feel/fool goodism arguements from the PC liberal crowd.:p

    Are you a Neanderthal? Shocking News by Scientist.
     

    Son of Liberty

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2009
    225
    16
    you ever been to a club? you ever notice the difference between the way a black man and a white man pck up chicks? i have. the black mans hands are everywhere but where they should be. sure it happens both ways. but i know that statisticly (based on population of the race) the numbers of black men that dont have respect for women are higher than white men.

    Thats not being racist. thats a cultural FACT. you have to realize that there are MAJOR cultural differences between ANY race of people! thats what we are talking about here. culturaly a lot of them have been conditioned to take what doesnt belong to them, and to use violence if wanted. that doesnt mean all of that culture is bad. but it sure tells me to be on guard.

    call me racist. i dont give a flying poo poo. im not. i will give anyone the same benefit of the doubt until they prove me otherwise.


    Would love to see this study, so I could see this fact for myself. E what you said does sound racist and you are basically saying that blacks because of their culture are thieving, violent white beaters.

    Also I guess using that logic I guess the white culture of hate and abuse should have me on my guard too. It dosent make sense, anyway you cut it you are using someones race as a precursor to how you will treat and look at them. Isn't that the definition of someone being racist? Im not saying you are, Im saying what you said sounded a lot like racism.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,731
    113
    Uranus
    Would love to see this study, so I could see this fact for myself. E what you said does sound racist and you are basically saying that blacks because of their culture are thieving, violent white beaters.

    Also I guess using that logic I guess the white culture of hate and abuse should have me on my guard too. It dosent make sense, anyway you cut it you are using someones race as a precursor to how you will treat and look at them. Isn't that the definition of someone being racist? Im not saying you are, Im saying what you said sounded a lot like racism.

    Just cutting to the chase, see below.....

    Originally Posted by E5RANGER375

    call me racist. i dont give a flying poo poo. im not. i will give anyone the same benefit of the doubt until they prove me otherwise.


    More disturbing than Printcraft's avatar?

    You are a racist pig against fat, hairy, semi-nude, gun loving Americans. :noway:
     

    SavageEagle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    19,568
    38
    However, prejudice and hate aren't invented words, and deliberately exist in human nature. Racism is a specific type of prejudice and hate.

    Which is exactly why there will always be racism no matter what you do.

    Just like there will ALWAYS be war because you cannot rid the world of greed, evil, corruption, and power hungry people.

    It's all part of Human Nature.

    Whether you believe it religiously, or scientifically, everything has a balance in this universe. Everything. Good and evil, black and white, right and wrong. You can't have one without the other.
     

    JBusch8899

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 6, 2010
    2,234
    36
    Which is exactly why there will always be racism no matter what you do.

    Just like there will ALWAYS be war because you cannot rid the world of greed, evil, corruption, and power hungry people.

    It's all part of Human Nature.

    Whether you believe it religiously, or scientifically, everything has a balance in this universe. Everything. Good and evil, black and white, right and wrong. You can't have one without the other.

    Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes.

    (Sounds like the restaurant scene in the film, "When Harry met Sally.")

    :+1:...but more like +14.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 7, 2010
    2,211
    38
    (INDY-BRipple)
    Has to be one of the dumbest statements Ive read lately

    Im curious if you could please expand on this assumption.

    I, personally didnt know Trotsky was responsible; But it does make sense concerning how many millions (21-66 million) of Russians were murdered in the name of Communism/Marxism by the Bolsheviks, who Trotsky was a member of.

    I spent about 20minutes on the internet.


    It's a fact that the word "Racist" is aimed, mainly at just those of European descent. We can look at how liberal/democrats have given the "Charge" with nothing more than seeing abunch of angry White guys, who I dare say are far from being "racist".

    Even in the face of illegal immigration, White Americans are called "Racist" for not allowing amnesty, or atleast wanting it.

    But nevermind, the largest, single Pro-amnesty Latino group that does exist in America is called "La Raza" or The Race.


    Im just looking to read a more expanded point of view from you SOL :cheers:

    Wednesday, January 6, 2010

    "Racist" -- A Word Invented by USSR's Leon Trotsky


    by Dustin Stanley


    Link

    The word "racist" has for a long time been the single most effective fear-word in the leftist and neoconservative arsenal. For decades, they have successfully used it in the political arena to slander traditionalists, shut down debate, and leave opponents running for cover. In the social arena, they have caused even more damage by using it to brainwash impressionable children and young college students, and to teach people to hate their nation, their cultural traditions, and worst of all, themselves.

    What surprisingly remains almost totally undiscussed, even on the hard core traditionalist Right, is the word's origin. Did it come from a liberal sociologist? A 60's Marxist college professor? Perhaps a politician in the Democratic Party? No. It turns out that the word was invented by none other than one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky.

    Take a look at this document if you would, dear reader.

    Славянофильство, мессианизм отсталости, строило свою философию на том, что русский народ и его церковь насквозь демократичны, а официальная Россия -- это немецкая бюрократия, насажденная Петром. Маркс заметил по этому поводу: "Ведь точно так же и тевтонские ослы сваливают деспотизм Фридриха II и т. д. на французов, как будто отсталые рабы не нуждаются всегда в цивилизованных рабах, чтобы пройти нужную выучку". Это краткое замечание исчерпывает до дна не только старую философию славянофилов, но и новейшие откровения "расистов".

    This is Leon Trotsky's 1930 work, "The History of the Russian Revolution", from which shown above is a passage. The last word in that passage is "расистов", whose Latin transliteration is "racistov", i.e., "racists". This work here is the first time in history one will ever find that word.

    My more doubtful readers may check the internet, the microfiche and microfilm at the local library, as well as the numerous books arrayed along the shelves there, but they shall never find an earlier usage of the word "racist" than Trotsky's coinage of the word here.

    So the next logical question is what was Leon Trotsky's purpose in inventing this word? To find out, let us look at a full English translation of the paragraph we looked at before.

    "Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: "In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them." This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the 'racists.'"

    The Slavophiles which Trotsky alluded to were historically a group of traditionalist Slavs who valued greatly their native culture and way of life, and wanted to protect it. Trotsky on the other hand saw them and others like them as an impedement to his internationalist communist plans for the world. This man didn't care one iota about the Slavic Russians whom he supposedly served. To him, Slavophiles, i.e. Slavs that committed the "crime" of loving their own people and trying to protect their traditional ways were simply "backward", and others like them were simply "racists".

    The reality of the word's origin is indeed quite a far cry from the left-liberal version of the story: that the word was coined in bona fides to identify people who were just plain bigoted against certain racial groups, and as a rallying cry for good liberals to protect the racial minorities from the bigots. On the contrary, the actual concept behind the word (even though he hadn't invented it quite yet) -- that ethnocentric "backwardness" must take a back seat to "enlightened" internationalism -- was often used by Army-Navy Commissar Trotsky as a rallying cry for good Red Army communists to embark upon murderous rampages against peoples who resisted having their traditional way of life paved over and replaced withan alien system.[1]

    Fast-forwarding to today in 2010, the only changes to the word and its underlying concept from 1930 (besides Marxists having perfected the art of achieving the same thing with less blood but no less misery) are that the word's targets have expanded from just Slavs who won't submit to the Marxist internationalist plan to uproot and destroy their culture and traditional way of life, to all white people, Slavic or otherwise, who won't submit to that same vile Marxist plan. Also, those who arm themselves with the word have expanded from a handful of communists to the entire liberal and neoconservative establishment in nations all across the world.

    Leon Trotsky, after helping Lenin to create the Soviet murder machine in which he and Trotsky killed 1 to 4 million[2] people, was removed from power and expelled from the Soviet Union in the year 1929 after losing a power struggle to become Lenin's successor to Josef Stalin. However, before fading into the pages of history, Leon Trotsky would do one last thing in 1930 that would arguably cause more damage to the West than Stalin and his successors' entire Soviet nuclear arsenal could ever have done. He would invent a word that would empower literally the most rotten, traitorous weasels within the West to redefine those loyal to their people, their cultural traditions and way of life as the worst evil, and to send the government, the education system, and the mass media on an absolute royal crusade until they themselves and virtually everyone else around them actually believe it. And this unholy creation would be repeated over and over again, bolstered by revisionist history fabricated by more of the same rotten weasels falsely portraying the white man as the sole perpetrator of slavery and genocide in the world, and this would go on and on until the West would submit via demoralization to the entire Trotskyist internationalist agenda without a single shot being fired. We can see the final stages of this playing out right now, with racial double standards having been created here in America (at the expense of American whites, of course), with the creation of "racism" and "hate speech" offenses in Europe (only targeting the indigineous population, of course), with the Canadian and Australian governments having implemented "multiculturalism" as official state policy (at the expense of the pre-existing Canadian and Australian cultures), and most of all, with the huge wave of third-world immigration into the West, supported by all Western governments (otherwise it wouldn't be happening), which is radically changing the makeup and culture of those countries, and is threatening their original populations with becoming a minority in their own countries within just a few decades.

    Due especially to Trotsky's hand in the murder of millions of people under the Lenin regime, as well as the ongoing global recession causing many fence sitters to take a side in these affairs, Rightists have a real opportunity to shut the lid on this word once and for all, simply by telling the truth about who invented the word and what its purpose was (and is). It is an opportunity that we cannot afford to miss. One can hardly imagine a true Euro-nationalist movement where most of the people in it believe they are "racists" for daring to embark on such a project, as today's reigning system would have us believe.


    [1]There is an appalling lack of good material available on the internet about the additional tragedy of the repression of regional sovereignty and self-determination movements after the Czar's collapse in Russia by Trotsky's Red Army. One of the best things you'll find on the web about it is the Nina Turmarkin interview which is the last thing I linked on the paragraph demarcated by this footnote, and is located here:
    (Heaven on Earth . The Film: Nina Tumarkin Interview | PBS). Ms. Turmarkin discusses the optimism that existed after the February Revolution which overthrew the Czar, about villages that declared their independence from the regime and sewed their own flags, etc. She doesn't go on to say what happened to those villages and such, but if you know the history, you know of course that they were forced back into the fold, an even worse fold than the Czar's for that matter, at the point of a Red Army bayonet held by a soldier commanded by Trotsky, and those who would not go back into that worse fold were of course killed. Anyhow, I truly would suggest that the interested reader on this subject get hold of book sources for further reading, because unfortunately what is out there on the web is the bottom of the barrel.

    [2]The higher estimate of state murder (4 million) under the Lenin/Trotsky regime is that of political scientist R.J. Rummel in his book Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917, found here: (USSR--Genocide and Mass Murder). I myself was taught a lower estimate of 1-2 million during my school years. The main factors in the deaths were executions of dissidents, brutal suppressions of the self-determination movements that arose after the fall of the Czar and in reaction to the early Soviet police state, and the Russian famine of 1921. The new Soviet government was certainly responsible for the first two. They were at least somewhat responsible for the third, but exactly how responsible is a matter of debate that is beyond the scope of this article. Either way, 1-2 million, 4 million, or somewhere in between, it is absolutely atrocious what happened under that regime.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom