Whatever grandiose knockout argument-ending point you think you have, for the love of God will you please get to it?? This babbling drivel is boring the **** out of me.
Whatever grandiose knockout argument-ending point you think you have, for the love of God will you please get to it?? This babbling drivel is boring the **** out of me.
And I asked you why you think gender identity issues are wrong, and you cant answer it.
Ok ok, I wanted you all to come to the conclusion on your own, but here goes. All of those who believe that there are no absolute rights or wrongs have no basis to tell anybody they are wrong.
And I asked you why you think gender identity issues are wrong, and you cant answer it..,... but I can... you see things in black/white, based on a certain religion..... and that certain religious belief is dictating your "absolute" beliefs.... and that's as far as I will go with religion .... Im not saying you are wrong or right, but we as free thinking individuals can believe what we want... but as soon as that belief causes harm to others, its can no longer be just about your belief, its now what society deems acceptable.
Can you quote me yet? Still waiting to see when I told you that you were wrong.
I believe more than a few members here would like to answer the question, but forum rules don't allow us to.
5) Religious and racially based threads of any nature are not allowed on INGunOwners.com.
All Indiana Gun Owners should feel comfortable on this forum no matter their race, religion or color. Everyone is welcome here on INGO and should feel comfortable being associated with this site
I'm waiting on your answer to my question and then I'll quote it. There's no way you're going to say murder is right. That would be crazy talk. But then again, if there are no rights and wrongs......
Still waiting on a quote.......
I will in a second.
I'm waiting on your answer to my question and then I'll quote it.
Got what I needed out of the thread.... Peace out.I wasn't saying that previously in this thread you had said something was wrong.
Got what I needed out of the thread.... Peace out.
I think this is, as I stated before, because people are focusing on him rather than the concepts or ideas he's trying to get through.
Let's stop asking each other "SO DO YOU THINK RAPE AND MOLESTATION ARE WRONG?" and get back to generalities and concepts.
Less about the person, more about the ideas. People in this thread are so angry at each other, the posts are very pointed and "attack-y"
It very likely has something to do with the fact that many men have wive's and daughters. Men are psychologically programmed as "protectors"; protectors of their family, protectors of their home, protectors of everything around them (in general). I can tell you I'd happily and willingly lay down my life to protect my family from harm, whether it be financial, physical, or psychological if laying down my life is what it would take. I would imagine that the great deal of consternation comes from the fact that, even if "experts claim" a transgender individual is not a risk to a woman, the man, the protector, still perceives it as a threat. Why would he perceive that as a threat? What is the threat? Most of it is likely upbringing and societal influence and it will take generations to change. That being said, I feel there are legitimate threats. A parent should have the right to determine when the sex talk is appropriate and until that time we don't expose our children to things that would necessitate an advancement of that time window. Yet a transgender person in a locker-room setting etc could necessitate that. What harm could come from that? I'm no mental health expert so I can't say for certain, but it could likely be the fact that the girl isn't ready to face those facts of life. For the same reason we don't drive and vote until a certain age, our brains take time to mature to a certain point of truly understanding things like this. Another threat could be the mentally unstable person that wants to be transgender for nefarious purposes. Yes, it's exceedingly rare, but it's not out of the realm of possibility; society has shown us that the length at which mentally ill people will go to fulfill their desires has no bounds. Remember the guy that crawled into the pit of the outhouse at a state/local park a while ago just to get a peek at the bottom side of women? Don't tell me it's not possible for a man to pose as transgender and use the women's lockerroom for nefarious purposes.Something else I've noticed, why does it seem to be largely the wiminfolk who have no problem with penis-havers behaving like females, while it's other penis-havers who have the biggest problems with that concept? It's not your penises that are at controversy in these personal stories.
This is funny, you giving me this direction.