E5RANGER375
Shooter
Geez, I love the KMart lawyering and cop bashing already.
1. Cops don't have rights. They have authority.
2. A police officer has the authority to stop and detain anyone, disarm them, cuff them, pat them down, identify them, and pose a limited number of questions to them. This would include viewing and confirming the validity of one's driver's license and LTCH.
If one doesn't believe my above statement, I direct you to Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Stop and Identify statutes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, and IC 34-28-5-3, which states:
Detention
Sec. 3. Whenever a law enforcement officer believes in good faith that a person has committed an infraction or ordinance violation, the law enforcement officer may detain that person for a time sufficient to:
(1) inform the person of the allegation;
(2) obtain the person's:
(A) name, address, and date of birth; or
(B) driver's license, if in the person's possession; and
(3) allow the person to execute a notice to appear.
As added by P.L.1-1998, SEC.24.
as highlighted in your above post, they must have a GOOD FAITH SUSPICION THAT A CRIME OR INFRACTION HAS BEEN COMMITTED. the deputy or IMPD did not. matter of fact IMPD knew right away he didnt break the law.
yeah i think there is deffinately some K-mart lawyering going on in this thread, with a side of holster sniffing to go with it.
JBusch8899, are you a lawyer?
also, if the OP consented to the detention and offered up his license willingly then he has no claim except to file a complaint on the deputy for not knowing Indiana handgun law (which he should).