Yeah the point I was making is that Kroger states that their policy is to side with state law concerning the carry of firearms or such but it seems to me they only extend that policy until someone complains.I was thinking the same thing. What if you were to go in and complain that someone was not armed. Would the manager be forced, as a condition of following corporate policy that must be adhered to by the letter, to have that offending person(s) immediately leave the premises? Or does that policy just apply to licensed proper people legally carrying firearms?
I also wonder if a manager was bent on not having any OC firearms in the store could merely say that there has been a complaint. Sounds like a easy way out that is beyond refute...
So in other words if someone complains to the manager just for the simple reason that they don't like guns then I guess that will result in an OC'r who is doing nothing more than shopping for groceries will be asked to leave.
Well the examples I gave previously should give me the grounds to complain and therefore have someone asked to leave because I don't like the way they smell or how bout I complain to management that I don't like people with red hair or moustaches. Would they then be asked to leave?
The point in all of this for me is they either have a policy of siding with state law when it comes to legally carrying a firearm or they don't.