Meh. You put things in social media, you should expect social commentary.
I wouldn't shoot a giraffe, but I'm also not funding a significant chunk of the economy of sub-Saharan Africa like big game hunters are. A good friend of mine went on a hunt in Africa and, among other things, killed a zebra. To me that's like shooting a jauntily painted horse. It made a nice rug, though. I see both sides.
I think most folks have a scale. I suspect most here would react differently to canned hunting for dogs or horses then they would to turkeys or squirrels. Personally, the more intelligent an animal is the more I'd be against trophy hunting. Wanna bass fish? Cool. Dolphin fishing? Less cool.
It doesn't take long to get over the idea that zebras are just like horses if you try hunting one. The ones I saw in South Africa were easily among the most switched on animals I've ever encountered and that includes several species that are typically shot upon sight as varmints or freezer fillers. Their only real weakness is curiosity, at the first sign of potential danger they will retreat to the nearest high point to observe from a safe distance but on occasion they will drift in closer to watch you stalk other animals. Once they get the idea that they are being hunted though, they disappear in a hurry.
As for dolphin, anyone who spends much time trying to fish from piers or wade fishing in shallow bays in Florida gets over their affection for them real fast.
Ya, but they could have used the money spent on the safari to buy those people meat from the store instead...then no animals would have had to die
In much of Africa, South Africa especially, a lot of the meat one could buy in the store is from game animals. They raise a lot of sheep, cows and even a few pigs most but ranchers primarily eat game and any grocery store or a restaurant will usually have game meat for sale.
I have no issue with the legality of the practice. If people want to do it, I'm not suggesting that they shouldn't be able to do it. The justification for doing it, comes from the SA government, not the hunters themselves, who IMO don't really care about the reasonings, as long as it's legal, and they can shoot something very few other people have a chance to.
The SA government has little to do with most of the hunting, the exception being certain sensitive species. The animals are the property of and managed by the landowners. When the landowner has more wild animals than they want or can tolerate(competitions with their livestock) they either sell them to hunters(local or foreign) or they setup a cull and sell the meat to local butchers, groceries, or restaurants. Most of the 29 species of huntable animals in South Africa were nearly extirpated from the late 1800s through the mid 1900s due to competition with livestock and the ever present potential to spread disease to livestock. Around the late 1960s some ranchers realized they could make a better living by raising wildlife and selling hunts. By the 1990s the idea had spread and wildlife populations were flourishing.... thanks to the visionary ranchers and the hunters dollars.