Afghanistan

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    7,347
    113
    Indy




    More from the total chaos at the airport. Several dead in a crowd stampede at the terminal. A few people tried to stow away in the wheelwells of a C17 and ended up going splat on local rooftops. An Apache was sweeping the runway with the rotor wash to try to clear people so the planes could take off.
     

    rhamersley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2016
    4,176
    113
    Danville




    More from the total chaos at the airport. Several dead in a crowd stampede at the terminal. A few people tried to stow away in the wheelwells of a C17 and ended up going splat on local rooftops. An Apache was sweeping the runway with the rotor wash to try to clear people so the planes could take off.

    This $#!+'s making the fall of Saigon look like an orderly retreat...
     

    KittySlayer

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 29, 2013
    6,486
    77
    Northeast IN
    An Apache was sweeping the runway with the rotor wash to try to clear people so the planes could take off.
    I would think a C-17 could take off even if the tarmac surface was a little "squishy". Might be a bit cold and heartless, kind of like driving a semi tractor through people "peacefully" protesting on an interstate. But if you fear for your life and are in an S-Hole country/US city you do what you have to do.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,636
    113
    Why was any of that equipment left in one piece?
    They were still delivering helicopters in the last few weeks....I would like to see a link claiming the equipment is out of US possession though. Only seeing it here, but wife is in surgery so somewhat preoccupied
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,136
    113
    Part of this is what happens when news is profit driven. Having reporters is expensive. Having international reporters is even more expensive. Having reporters in danger is expensive and bad PR. So they don't have reporters. They have repeaters. They buy stories from somewhere like the AP or local sources or just sift social media and repeat. Kind of like meteorologists vs weathermen. The second is cheaper but is just repeating information.
    Given that the news was already profit-driven when Dan Rather was a plebe, and NPR was caught slack-jawed as anybody ("Check This Interactive Map of Where you Need to Mask Indoors!"), it's hard to fathom the point of this, unless it's just some kind of protest against the concept of profit.

    The news was never not profit-driven. They just have more competitors now. The reasons for which are pretty obvious and insolvable.
     

    Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    7,347
    113
    Indy
    I would think a C-17 could take off even if the tarmac surface was a little "squishy". Might be a bit cold and heartless, kind of like driving a semi tractor through people "peacefully" protesting on an interstate. But if you fear for your life and are in an S-Hole country/US city you do what you have to do.
    For sure. Think they're just trying to avoid killing more people than absolutely necessary. Clearly a complete failure of security at the airport, imagine if the Taliban had a suicide bomber or two in that mob.
     

    Mikey1911

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 14, 2014
    2,869
    113
    Newburgh
    For sure. Think they're just trying to avoid killing more people than absolutely necessary. Clearly a complete failure of security at the airport, imagine if the Taliban had a suicide bomber or two in that mob.
    Might be harder than normal to get volunteers for suicide bombings, when “fighters” think they’re going to get a 15-year old girl or a still fertile sub-45 year old widow in the next several weeks.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,735
    113
    Uranus
    For sure. Think they're just trying to avoid killing more people than absolutely necessary. Clearly a complete failure of security at the airport, imagine if the Taliban had a suicide bomber or two in that mob.

    It would help clear the runway? :dunno:
     

    Keith_Indy

    Master
    Rating - 95.2%
    20   1   0
    Mar 10, 2009
    3,287
    113
    Noblesville
    We really never should have been trying to remake Afghanistan into a "democracy."

    Shameful there's no plan in place to evacuate Afghanis who helped us.

    But, on the plus side, even corporate media can't ignore this, and are doing real reporting on Hiden Biden and his band of incompetents'...

    NOTE the data on this article. I recall reading it way back when and thinking, well, we should just bomb the stuffing out of the terrorists and leave them alone otherwise.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/14/terrorism.afghanistan10

    ‘You can rent Afghanistan,’ one commander said last week, ‘but you can’t buy it.’



    No one could agree on what scenario would be best suited to Afghanistan. No one had any real idea of how to form an inclusive and representational government. Their country, after all, has never had one.

    On two things they all agreed: first, that the American air strikes had made the task of winning wavering Taliban commanders over far harder by turning the hardline Islamic militia from villains into victims and, second, that a decision by the allies to use ground troops would mean the coalition’s war was no longer against terrorism but against Afghanistan. Then there would be only one thing for the disparate factions of the country to do: fight the invader.
     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    95   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    16,636
    113
    Indy
    I’m cynical enough to say this, effort to turn these States blue?
    Only United States citizens can vote.
    Refugees in the United States cannot vote.
    Refugees must be permanent residents for at least 5 years before applying for citizenship.

    In any event, what about Afghan refugees turned US citizens would make you think that they would "vote blue?"
     

    Mikey1911

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 14, 2014
    2,869
    113
    Newburgh
    Only United States citizens can vote.
    Refugees in the United States cannot vote.
    Refugees must be permanent residents for at least 5 years before applying for citizenship.

    In any event, what about Afghan refugees turned US citizens would make you think that they would "vote blue?"
    With ”politically correct” software, not only can they “vote blue” if they become US citizens; they don’t even have to physically exist to “vote blue”.
     
    Top Bottom