Interesting. I hadn't heard about Antifa.
That's because you subscribe to fairly coherent newsites, rather that the tinfoil nutcase ones.
Interesting. I hadn't heard about Antifa.
Tin foil hat on: This guy was probably blackmailed that if he doesn't carry out this plan, his family and love one would pay the price. He's the perfect candidate for this considering he's a loner and no criminal history.
So do we just brush off this young lady's account of their being a warning 45 minutes before the shooting ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c1UNSm1Fks
She doesn't appear drunk or crazy .
Dats wacist!Yes, if you whyte you vilent.
Antifa and isis both claimed the shooter as one of their own.
That speaks volumes to those paying attention.
Fox News is reporting that he purchased 2 stocks that turn a semi auto into a full auto gun. Just a bit misleading but with a 60 round mag would be close to full auto if you know how to use the stock.
The caliber of the weapon or the caliber of the dancers?
I say we go with it, name antifa a terrorist Group and shut down every demonstration with the Guard and run every one of them. Seize all assets of anyone supporting them.
It's irrational
The history covered in the 2A cases provides some logical cover for "registration isn't confiscation." But, I'd rather not go down that rabbit hole.That pesky Constitution may have something to say about that.
I was waiting for someone to say this! Now, add to that - a true marksman ninja who actually did the shooting and offed the old dude when the cops arrived and disappeared all ninja like! There. Saw your tinfoil hat and raised it with tin foil rabbit-ears!
I think this tends to be true, but it doesn't have to be. There are objective, utilitarian, logical reasons to have laws. Some laws that we have now are objective, and logical and have utility beyond any moral component, in which any moral components can be coincidence. It's most cultures think it's "wrong" to murder, but if there were no moral component in that at all a law against murder would be objective, logical and utilitarian.
That keeps bugging me too.
She may be known locally as a bible thumper crazy person who says this to people all the time
That pesky Constitution may have something to say about that.
The history covered in the 2A cases provides some logical cover for "registration isn't confiscation." But, I'd rather not go down that rabbit hole.
Hundreds of deposition and dozens of trials tell me that people think they saw or heard a lot of things, really, truly, believe it.
Re-read the history and tell me what the authors of the constitution tolerated that did not rise to the level of "infringed."Something, something, shall not be infringed.
Well supposedly this lady and another guy were escorted by police out of the venue. Should be some record of it if true