oops - don't know how I missed that in this short thread.
oops - don't know how I missed that in this short thread.
Not knowingly, as you could have read, had you chosen to do so.
A 17-year old boy, in many cases, believes he's a man and many would not run home to daddy, but would attempt to handle the situation as a man would be "expected."
Like attacking someone that they thought was harassing them?
A 17-year old boy, in many cases, believes he's a man and many would not run home to daddy, but would attempt to handle the situation as a man would be "expected."
A 17-year old boy, in many cases, believes he's a man and many would not run home to daddy, but would attempt to handle the situation as a man would be "expected."
Next time you have your piece on you and someone threatening comes your way and harasses you... I'll expect you to high tail and run?
That's the rub. That missing step that is unknown what happened, best described here:
View From The Porch: Where are they getting these crystal balls?
The step which is unknown (??????) is controlling.
I think if we can conclude anything from this case in Florida is that avoidance is best. The only unknown is that the gun carrier's life will be turned upside for many years.
I guess you are now the one with the facts. I didn't know it was determined that the kid was the aggressor, but I've not watched the news or read about the case. Is that a new development?
To answer your question, maybe.
Yet, apparently, he walked toward Zimmerman.
I didn't read anything that says he "walked toward"... but even if he had... that was a sign for Barney Fife to jump out of his truck?
Or maybe Barney Fife followed him for 4 blocks and jumped out of his truck, then Martin walked toward him.
Either way, "Fight" was signaled for a reason... and the reason was prompted by Zimmerman deciding it was a good idea to follow slowly behind Martin in an unmarked vehicle, then jump out of it and pretend to be a crime scene investigator and interrogate someone who hadn't committed a crime.
How you can say that Martin was the antagonist in this situation is beyond me?
The other conclusion is that the loss of a 17 year old with reportedly so much promise is a tragedy.
I have a nephew who is turning 14, I cannot image his loss. The parents are no doubt beyond tears but I fear that the grand jury report (especially if a no bill) will not result in closure.
It sounds so desperate to take any small spec of evidence you have that supports your claims and try to make it a solid argument and simply ignore all the facts present?
There's more than a reasonable doubt at this point, even using your manufactured "facts."Sorry to tell you, but you are guilty beyond a "REASONABLE DOUBT" not "WITHOUT DOUBT"....
How? By being a "creepy white guy" in your estimation.Zimmerman provoked the kid... that is a FACT! Zimmerman then decided to put himself right into the fire line... whether he threw the first punch or received the first punch is almost irrelevant.
How? By calling 911? By being on the sidewalk?He provoked the kid to the point where the kid decided he was threatened enough to protect himself.
No, but the available report facts point to the possibility that the physical violence was initiated by Martin.Lets not sit here and pretend that the kid ran after the car and provoked Zimmerman to get out, then started beating Zimmerman until he pulled the trigger.
Saying FACT doesn't make it so. If Martin approached Zimmerman, then Martin was not "standing his ground," he was advancing toward someone who was supposedly "creepy."Zimmerman was the aggressor to the point where his target felt the need to stand his ground.... once Zimmerman was in over his head, he shot the kid. FACT
From the 911 transcript:You apparently have grave reading comprehension problems. We don't know when Zimmerman got out of his vehicle. How you get "he jumped out" is beyond me. Zimmerman was on the phone with 911 (listen to the call, "he's walking toward me") when Martin apparently started his approach. I didn't say Martin was the antagonist, I said we don't know, but I certainly can not discount it.
From the 911 transcript:
1:03 - "now he's coming toward me"
2:08 - "he's running ... toward the other entrance of the neighborhood."
2:24 - "Are you following him?" "Yeah"
4:07 Call Ends
Help me out here please. How does one conclude from the above that Martin confronted Zimmerman?
I think the ensuing wrongful death civil suit will pretty much so be a slam dunk.
Zimmerman is going to be paying for this FOREVER.