But where is the evidence that contradicts Zimmerman's statement that Martin confronted him on his way back to his vehicle.
"Zimmerman exited his vehicle against the wishes of a dispatcher"
I'm sure the dispatcher wished Z had not exited his vehicle. EVERYONE except Al Sharpton wishes that. But can you demonstrate from the known facts exactly what dispatcher's statement Z disregarded.
It makes no sense, at least to me, that Zimmerman would go so far simply to turn around and head back to his vehicle.
Perhaps he thought that discretion is the better part of valor? Perhaps he took to heart what the 911 dispatcher told him and broke off his tail?
Have you decided to do something and then reconsidered and turned on your heel?
"I want Fig Newtons . . . no, I don't *turns and walks back down grocery store aisle*"
I'm not sure I'm following what you are getting at.
There are some trying to insinuate that Martin being a pot smoker is proof that he was a thug. When INGOers do it, it's a youthful mistake.
Nope. I don't condone it for anyone. You want to risk destroying your life for an illegal toke, go for it. But don't expect me to feel sorry for you when you continue to make poor likfe decisions.
Zimmerman was not talking to a dispatcher, he was talking with a 911 operator. The operator did not tell him not to exit his vehicle, Z was told we do not need you to do that, Z said OK, and then said I lost him. Didnt anyone listen to the 911 call or read the transcript?
This BS about “dispatcher” and “911 operator” is obviously from people who are not familiar with modern public safety operations. Most of these “regular phone operators” are very specialized and trained specifically for the type of calls they handle. Many states, including Florida, have certification standards. Some communities consider them resource managers and actually pay them more than police officers. Regardless, of who was on the phone with Z, there wasn’t any “order” given, only a suggestion.Kutnupe14, all those quotes really made me laugh. Avoidance isnt really possible to be a good community watch person. Nothing he did by getting out of the vehicle is illegal. The defense rattles off alot of their evidence while people keep pressing on the prosecutors comments about we have evidence...WHAT EVIDENCE? Zimmerman handled the situation stupidly but the same thing could have happened if Zimmerman was on foot that night instead of in his vehicle. Zimmerman was in the beginning seemingly trying to do the right thing. Until it can be proven for sure who the aggressor was, he did NOTHING illegal...
And for those who keep saying he ignored the orders of police, most dispatchers arent police....they are just regular phone operators working for the county, city, etc, sometimes working for the police.
Well, Carmel, who knows, those questions may be on the mind of the jurors (assuming the case gets beyond the summary judgment phase of the Florida law).
I’ve read most of this thread, but admittedly not 100%. Perhaps someone raised this question up stream. Martin knew Zimmerman was following him, but who did M think Z was? Police reported that Z never identified himself to M. Did M know Z was the community watch captain? Perhaps M thought Z was setting him up?
Z thinks M is a burglar. M thinks Z is a mugger. Not a good combination.
I don't know what Martin was thinking, hence all the discussion. Some (if not most) of us would certainly handle the situation differently than Martin and Zimmerman. Goes back to the perfect storm scenario. Two rational people and this would likely not have ended tragically. One or both being irrational, and the milieu changes.Here's my take on this. If you think that the person following you is a mugger, do you hide, then come out behind him and initiate a fight? Or do you finish going the last half block to your home and call the police? If you're truly scared, you don't confront them in that manner and you surely don't punch them in the face.
This is the part I noticed but in all fairness I'll have to give you credit for presenting a well thought out case to support your stance that George Zimmerman's life should be ruined.Hence the IANAL
(1)
This is the part I noticed but in all fairness I'll have to give you credit for presenting a well thought out case to support your stance that George Zimmerman's life should be ruined.
What's with the discussion on disregarding the operator? I thought that was disposed of weeks ago. As I recall, it was stated long ago by the powers that be down in Sanford that there was no duty for Zimmerman to follow the suggestion by the operator to not follow Martin. So if there was no legal compulsion, Zimmerman could follow Martin around all he wanted to.
.....
Looking at this incident holistically, there's something that compelled the police investigator to seek manslaughter charges and subsequently, the prosecutor's murder rap........