No, not at all. I want all Americans to have the privledges. Most of which are already guaranteed by the Constitution, but denied by Washington's corruption.
That's a fair enough position. Mind you, I do think there have to be limits on even Freedom of Religion (Consider, for instance, someone who "converted" to a belief in certain Central American religions, of if some proponents of modern Asatru wanted to resurrect old practices in the worship of Odin). The real question is where to draw the line. (A pet peeve of mine is people saying "you have to draw the line somewhere" in favor of the status quo when the argument is about where that line should be drawn. Response is, "Yes, you have to draw the line somewhere, and I think it should be drawn over here instead of over there.")
As for "living off the land," at least some nations, in some states, do have that "right." They need not obtain hunting or fishing licenses or observe legal bag limits. This has caused controversy because some members of those nations, far from being the "at one with nature, taking only what he needs" of myth, instead uses that "right" to take large catches that essentially go to waste. (Not saying all, or even most, but it does highlight the need to have some way of enforcing restraint for the few who spoil it for everyone.)