??? What?I'm not sure I agree with the grand jury here...
Did he need to threaten her & pull his firearm because she picked up the pot of boiling water and took it to the sink? Probably not.
Did she need to "rebuke him in the name of Jesus" for those actions? Again, probably not.
She also didn't need to pick up the pot of boiling water a second time after she ducked.
Ask yourself this question: if she had a pot of acid, or gasoline would that change your opinion of the threat she posed?
We do seem to be missing a good deal of the initial context showing this woman wasn't in a clear mental state.
Killing someone because they rebuke you in the name of Jesus?
I think he was wrong from what I saw.