Where Did Trump Get Wuwho Flu?

[ajeandy]

Obviously Hillary was in the corner of the debate room, walking the walls with a little spray bottle full of the covid, making sure to only mist the Republicans in the room. FFS.

 

[printcraft]

There is a walk-away movement from Democrats, that's certain. But there's also one from Trump too. The primary cause of people walking away from Dems has been the violence and Democrats' inability to call it for what it is and do something about it. When they discovered it's hurting their polling, BLM scrubbed some of the bat ****iest crazy language from their website. Democrats started quietly distancing themselves from the supporting the violent riots overtly......

Isn’t it AMAZING that that protests and 24/7 coverage have evaporated once the democrats found out it was polling badly?

If that doesn’t explain it to people they don’t want to understand. It’s purely a political stunt.
Same with the kungflu, it’s been bastardized into a political tool.

 

[drillsgt]

I’ll reverse that question, which you can infer my answer: “Do voters vote rationally?” Perception always carries more weight than reality.

I vote rationally, I don't see any advantage to electing biden/harris over Trump. If the biden/harris duo were pro-gun, pro-business, against massive tax increases and expanding obamacare, pro-military, didn't have a ridiculous 'clean energy' green new deal pipe dream, denounced the blm/antifa nonsense, maybe they'd be worth a look.

 

[jamil]

Does anyone besides the TDS crowd think that Trump's reelection chances are looking dim?

You don't have to be a Trump fan in the slightest to understand the repercussions of electing Harris/Biden.

I don't think I have TDS. I try to see things how they really are. As you know, I'm not a Trump fan. But I think he's done mostly okay as President. And I do plan to vote for him later this week, if my schedule doesn't change.

Okay, so qualifications out of the way, I'll answer the question. I think Trump's reelection changes aren't bright. I think I agree with Ben Shapiro, that if it's a referendum on Trump's character, he'll probably lose. If not, he has a good chance of winning. It seems to have shifted in the past 2 weeks from being a referendum on Democrats' craziness to Trump's character, and that's a bad thing for Trump. He needs to turn that around and make Democrats the bad guys again.

Does that mean Trump will lose? I don't know. What I know is that whoever turns out their voters most will win. When it's a referendum on Trump's character, that tends not to produce many Democrat walk-aways. But also it may tend to make some Trump voters stay home. Those voters need to realize, the Democrats haven't changed. They still don't know what bat **** crazy looks like. They don't realize it's them. They're more likely to drive us further towards a world no one can live in. No matter what you think about Trump's chances, you have to go out and vote. And I suggest that if at all possible, you vote in person. In-person voting has the highest integrity. You mail it in, even with our absentee mail in ballots, it's still much easier for your vote to be intercepted when voting through mail compared with in-person.

 

[drillsgt]

I'd like to see the fullness of evidence they used to trace it back to the nomination ceremony. I think a lot of people have a lot of reasons to lie during an election year. I'd like to see that vetted.

Did ACB get it, the one who was front and center through the whole thing?

 

[Ingomike]

Great. Another crockpot source with bs evidence spreading yet another baseless conspiracy theory. The number one threat to this country are conspiracy theories followed closely by polarizing, non-compromising politics that comprises of mindless cultists that follow their preferred party and/or leader blindly.

Trump caught Covid-19 via his own recklessness and it was traced back to the Supreme Court Justice nomination ceremony.

Townhall is a very reliable source but let's look at precisely what was said and the ridiculousness of these comments.

An accurate report that currently only prominent republicans and presidential campaign team have contracted covid post debate, after the only contact between the parties post covid is "conspiracy"?

To date no conclusion has been reached as to the original source that I have seen...

 

[jamil]

Isn’t it AMAZING that that protests and 24/7 coverage have evaporated once the democrats found out it was polling badly?

If that doesn’t explain it to people they don’t want to understand. It’s purely a political stunt.
Same with the kungflu, it’s been bastardized into a political tool.

It's not that coverage evaporated. They always covered it as "mostly peaceful" anyway. They learned to turn the cameras off 10PM when things were still pretty peaceful, then the rioting started at midnight and the only ones who captured that were streamers. And when violence was reported, they got BLM supporters to come on and say it was owed. Well, of course that didn't poll well. So they withdrew support. The coverage hasn't evaporated, the riots have...mostly. It's like a state sport in Portland.

So now in most cities, the rioting has pretty much wound down with only a few occasional flareups. But still, the point is true, it's been a political stunt with the full backing of media.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I vote rationally, I don't see any advantage to electing biden/harris over Trump. If the biden/harris duo were pro-gun, pro-business, against massive tax increases and expanding obamacare, pro-military, didn't have a ridiculous 'clean energy' green new deal pipe dream, denounced the blm/antifa nonsense, maybe they'd be worth a look.

Really? I'm confident a number of voters will vote Biden/Harris based solely, on how they preset themselves publicly, compared to Trump. Clearly, Trump's insults, language, tweets and general uncouthness are a turnoff for many voters. Unless you like that type of behavior, you don't that's an advantage over Biden Trump? I ask, because I'm not sure if you're one of those "fight back" Trumpers, who enjoy the way the president carries on.

 

[jamil]

Really? I'm confident a number of voters will vote Biden/Harris based solely, on how they preset themselves publicly, compared to Trump. Clearly, Trump's insults, language, tweets and general uncouthness are a turnoff for many voters. Unless you like that type of behavior, you don't that's an advantage over Biden Trump? I ask, because I'm not sure if you're one of those "fight back" Trumpers, who enjoy the way the president carries on.

Yes. Trump's behavior is a turnoff. Democrat's craziness is a bigger turnoff. At least to me. Not everyone has a problem with bat **** crazy ideological poison.

 

[JCSR]

Really? I'm confident a number of voters will vote Biden/Harris based solely, on how they preset themselves publicly, compared to Trump. Clearly, Trump's insults, language, tweets and general uncouthness are a turnoff for many voters. Unless you like that type of behavior, you don't that's an advantage over Biden Trump? I ask, because I'm not sure if you're one of those "fight back" Trumpers, who enjoy the way the president carries on.

I sure don't agree with some of Trump's behavior but I do find some of it humorous. I believe a person should earn what they have and it not be a gift from the government. That alone is why I could never vote for socialism.

 

[Ingomike]

Obviously Hillary was in the corner of the debate room, walking the walls with a little spray bottle full of the covid, making sure to only mist the Republicans in the room. FFS.

I will ask again, does the act of infecting the campaign have to have a genesis of a mastermind, like in the movies? Or could a result like this be perpetrated by unaffiliated but allied individuals with low level access to contaminate facilities ahead of the debate or practices?

 

[Ingomike]

Really? I'm confident a number of voters will vote Biden/Harris based solely, on how they preset themselves publicly, compared to Trump. Clearly, Trump's insults, language, tweets and general uncouthness are a turnoff for many voters. Unless you like that type of behavior, you don't that's an advantage over Biden Trump? I ask, because I'm not sure if you're one of those "fight back" Trumpers, who enjoy the way the president carries on.

Oh yes, the sensitive types, so hurt by words. And with you being a good guy, you just may have condemned the treatment of a POW war hero like McCain when the left and media insulted, maligned, and distorted a decent man. You may have done similar when a liberal elite businessman was treated similarly four years later. I wouldn't say I enjoy they way he carries on, but it is an equal response to how our previous candidates were treated, so I like the fighter even though I do not like the fight...

 

[Redhorse]

I will only say that the current state of America is due too the conniving and back side politics of some very left leaning useful idiots and those that fund them.
This is due to Trump brooming out the closets and back rooms up on the hill. A very complicit MSDM and enough brain washed lefty morons to support these actions.
How is this in any way on Trump. He did not release the Covid and for sure did not use it as a political tool. But the left sure latched onto it and they are still riding that train.

I am not a Trumper per-say but he is a fracking country mile better than than addled brained Biden/Harris combo for crap sake.

V-Sherpa has been slipping for a while Kut. He and I have had issues over his use of the forum a few times and he has not been kind in his responses. He came very near having my foot up his keister well before this melt down. For some reason he has been slipping away and find solace in blaming Trump.
He is not a good example. I would lean more towards the many lefty's I have seen come out against the Dem's and switching seats.

If Trump looses this election I fear my end times on this rock will not be very bright. That group would have us under their thumbs as quickly as possible. To think that mush brain Bidden will live for 4 more years or hold down that chair is a fallacy. We will have our 1st female oPOTUS or acting POTUS very soon if their game plan plays out.

Hold onto your socks and shorts my friend.

“The current state of this country” is the direct result of the lack of either party being able to compromise or work together for years. Everyone is so worried about winning they forget to work together to get anything done. Both sides are guilty of this making it, ironically a bipartisan issue.

 

[KJQ6945]

“The current state of this country” is the direct result of the lack of either party being able to compromise or work together for years. Everyone is so worried about winning they forget to work together to get anything done. Both sides are guilty o ru f this making it, ironically a bipartisan issue.

All elected members have sworn an oath to the Constitution. When one side wants to fundamentally change it, it doesn’t leave much room for compromise.

 

[johny5]

Does anyone besides the TDS crowd think that Trump's reelection chances are looking dim?

You don't have to be a Trump fan in the slightest to understand the repercussions of electing Harris/Biden.

Agreed. There are a bunch of polls out there showing Biden up by double digits, but if you look at the internals, the are sampling +D 9-11%. This does not line up with what I am seeing in enthusiasm from Trump's supporters.

I don't buy it, but only time will tell.

 

[drillsgt]

Really? I'm confident a number of voters will vote Biden/Harris based solely, on how they preset themselves publicly, compared to Trump. Clearly, Trump's insults, language, tweets and general uncouthness are a turnoff for many voters. Unless you like that type of behavior, you don't that's an advantage over Biden Trump? I ask, because I'm not sure if you're one of those "fight back" Trumpers, who enjoy the way the president carries on.

Those people are called 'low information voters' to put it nicely, putting emotion or feelings over policy. I don't really have a problem with how he 'carries on' we've needed somebody like him for awhile after having weak RINO's like McCain and Romney that let the media and democrats steamroll them. I'm not willing to vote for biden/harris because people think Trump says mean things lol. In case you haven't noticed biden hasn't exactly been all that polite and sensitive out on the campaign trail!

 

[Redhorse]

All elected members have sworn an oath to the Constitution. When one side wants to fundamentally change it, it doesn’t leave much room for compromise.

The other side isn’t any better. They just give a slightly better illusion at protecting the Constitution than the other. This close-minded thinking is the number one problem with this country.

 

[johny5]

This close-minded thinking is the number one problem with this country.

The number one threat to this country are conspiracy theories...

 

[BugI02]

I will ask again, does the act of infecting the campaign have to have a genesis of a mastermind, like in the movies? Or could a result like this be perpetrated by unaffiliated but allied individuals with low level access to contaminate facilities ahead of the debate or practices?

Check the guest list for the Barrett announcement for an E. S. Blofeld

 

[BugI02]

I don't think I have TDS. I try to see things how they really are. As you know, I'm not a Trump fan. But I think he's done mostly okay as President. And I do plan to vote for him later this week, if my schedule doesn't change.

Okay, so qualifications out of the way, I'll answer the question. I think Trump's reelection changes aren't bright. I think I agree with Ben Shapiro, that if it's a referendum on Trump's character, he'll probably lose. If not, he has a good chance of winning. It seems to have shifted in the past 2 weeks from being a referendum on Democrats' craziness to Trump's character, and that's a bad thing for Trump. He needs to turn that around and make Democrats the bad guys again.

Does that mean Trump will lose? I don't know. What I know is that whoever turns out their voters most will win. When it's a referendum on Trump's character, that tends not to produce many Democrat walk-aways. But also it may tend to make some Trump voters stay home. Those voters need to realize, the Democrats haven't changed. They still don't know what bat **** crazy looks like. They don't realize it's them. They're more likely to drive us further towards a world no one can live in. No matter what you think about Trump's chances, you have to go out and vote. And I suggest that if at all possible, you vote in person. In-person voting has the highest integrity. You mail it in, even with our absentee mail in ballots, it's still much easier for your vote to be intercepted when voting through mail compared with in-person.

Apologies for leaning into your post. I would like to add the suggestion vote early as well as in person. My rationale is that the other side knows that conservatives prefer the way things have always been done like voting in person, so it is possible crowds will be out causing disruptions and trouble that might delay or interfere with in person voting. Like you, I will either vote later this week or early next week

I would implore people to not take the chance that troubles might prevent them from voting on election day. Every vote in this election is likely to be important