What is "Black Lives Matter"?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    The American Revolution seems like a pretty good example. It fits completely within the definition of terrorism. So I guess terrorism is in our heritage.

    The long-form definition of terrorism includes acts done not under the auspices of the State, and against civilian (i.e. non-military, i.e. non-agents of the state) targets. The colonials fought under the auspices of the colonial army, against the British army.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    Agreed, that definition is a bit vague. I like the legal one better:

    Here is the US "official" definition (Wikipedia):

    U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: "Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."

    There are also certain aspects of an act that constitute terrorism:

    • ineluctably political in aims and motives;
    • violent – or, equally important, threatens violence;
    • designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond the immediate victim or target;
    • conducted either by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or identifying insignia) or by individuals or a small collection of individuals directly influenced, motivated, or inspired by the ideological aims or example of some existent terrorist movement and/or its leaders; and

    • perpetrated by a subnational group or nonstate entity.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    At any rate, I don't think that the rioters are terrorists, per se.

    They meet the criteria of all three definitions I've posted.

    A:

    1. Their actions are inherently violent
    2. Their aims are political/ideological

    B:

    1. Their actions are premeditated
    2. Their actions are politically motivated
    3. Their actions are inherently violent
    4. Their actions are perpetuated against non-combatant targets
    5. Their actions are committed by a non-state entity
    6. Their actions are intended to influence an audience

    C:

    1. Their aims are political/ideological
    2. Their actions are inherently violent
    3. Their targets are civilians/non-military
    4. Their makeup is an organized, non-state entity
    5. Their intent is to influence an audience wider than their targets
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    They meet the criteria of all three definitions I've posted.

    A:

    1. Their actions are inherently violent
    2. Their aims are political/ideological

    B:

    1. Their actions are premeditated
    2. Their actions are politically motivated
    3. Their actions are inherently violent
    4. Their actions are perpetuated against non-combatant targets
    5. Their actions are committed by a non-state entity
    6. Their actions are intended to influence an audience

    C:

    1. Their aims are political/ideological
    2. Their actions are inherently violent
    3. Their targets are civilians/non-military
    4. Their makeup is an organized, non-state entity
    5. Their intent is to influence an audience wider than their targets

    So Bundy Ranch and the Wildlife takeover, terrorism?
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,103
    113
    Avon
    So Bundy Ranch and the Wildlife takeover, terrorism?

    Not violent. Acted against/toward state agents. And as far as I'm aware (at least in the BLM dispute), no intent to influence an audience wider than those with whom they engaged.

    So, no: of all the ways you could describe them and their actions, "terrorism" isn't among the descriptors.
     

    pudly

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    13,329
    83
    Undisclosed
    Segr92s.jpg
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Not violent. Acted against/toward state agents. And as far as I'm aware (at least in the BLM dispute), no intent to influence an audience wider than those with whom they engaged.

    So, no: of all the ways you could describe them and their actions, "terrorism" isn't among the descriptors.

    Breaking into a secured building, and threatening armed resistance against LE personnel if they try to remove them isn't violence? There's no mention of acting against "state agents," in your criteria, only military. They also held a rally in the county to bring attention to their struggle. I'd call a rally, "an attempt to influence a wider audience."
    And if that's the litmus test, then one would ask if the Ft Hood shooter shouldn't be considered a terrorist then (which I do consider him to be), because he targeted a military installation and his victims being military.
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    Keith Scott's family has viewed the shooting video. When asked if it supports police, their attorneys said "no comment"

    Well, seems we have an issue here.

    Reading the witness statement he was reading a book while driving. Did I get confused on this......How in the hell would she know what he was doing.
     

    1911ly

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 11, 2011
    13,420
    83
    South Bend
    The family needs to make a statment about the video. Whether the out come of the video proves wrong doing or not. I under stand the reasons for holding back the videos release until the family could view it. I still don't see the need to show the man's last moments of life in the media. I would not want to see it repeated over and over if it were my loved one.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,224
    77
    Camby area
    Keith Scott's family has viewed the shooting video. When asked if it supports police, their attorneys said "no comment"

    Translation: " we just had our lying asses handed to us and are too chicken to admit we were wrong and the facts destroyed our bogus, inflammatory claims"
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom