Vaccine coercion/bribery

[foszoe]

Are vaccinated and carrier independent?

Good question. Got an answer to either one?

 

[buckwacker]

Good question. Got an answer to either one?

Yes

 

[phylodog]

Good question. Got an answer to either one?

The vaccinated can and do carry and get infected. I don't know about the immune as far as carrying but I'd be surprised if they can't carry it.

 

[foszoe]

The vaccinated can and do carry and get infected. I don't know about the immune as far as carrying but I'd be surprised if they can't carry it.

I would think carrying it would be independent but have no idea. Buckwacker knows. But he ain't talkin'

 

[Flingarrows]

https://thebl.com/world-news/no-mor...as-country-removes-pandemic-restrictions.html

It's over, it's been over.

The ONLY REASON it's still being carried by the media and politicians is because the COVID cash cow is being milked.
It's a blank check for "emergency spending" pet projects and social control.

The site removed it already


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[phylodog]

The site removed it already


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Rowdy celebrations erupt in Norway as COVID restrictions end

Police in Norway have reported dozens of disturbances and violent clashes including mass brawls in the Nordic country’s big cities after streets, bars, restaurants and nightclubs were filled with people celebrating the end of COVID-19 restrictions.

apnews.com

 

[bwframe]

 

[jsharmon7]

He made some excellent points. My belief is that Fauci and other decision-makers have had no idea how to stop this virus. They’ve thrown everything at the wall and instead of admitting they didn’t know and it wasn’t working, they pressed on. I think the vaccine is sort of their last gasp effort to save face. They’re pushing this thing as hard as they can so they can “look we had it handled but ‘those people’ wouldn’t do their part.” It’s the only thing that makes sense to me. They sell the vaccine as the answer and then blame us when it doesn’t work. I’ve heard people here say it’s about control, or some great reset, or population control, or money, or whatever else. To me that implies a MASSIVE amount of global cooperation that just doesn’t seem possible. From heads of every country right down to your local medical professionals and politicians. I just don’t see that as being a viable plan. I think they just refuse to admit that, even as advanced as we are, we couldn’t stop the virus. That only requires people to trust that they know best, which is a lot more likely than a huge conspiracy.

 

[buckwacker]

I would think carrying it would be independent but have no idea. Buckwacker knows. But he ain't talkin'

I gave a fos answer to a fos question.

 

[JCSR]

I gave a fos answer to a fos question.

 

[foszoe]

I gave a fos answer to a fos question.

So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.

My questions are usually tough.

 

[buckwacker]

So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.

My questions are usually tough.

So you're saying you never have answers?

I don't find your questions that tough.

 

[BigRed]

He made some excellent points. My belief is that Fauci and other decision-makers have had no idea how to stop this virus. They’ve thrown everything at the wall and instead of admitting they didn’t know and it wasn’t working, they pressed on. I think the vaccine is sort of their last gasp effort to save face. They’re pushing this thing as hard as they can so they can “look we had it handled but ‘those people’ wouldn’t do their part.” It’s the only thing that makes sense to me. They sell the vaccine as the answer and then blame us when it doesn’t work. I’ve heard people here say it’s about control, or some great reset, or population control, or money, or whatever else. To me that implies a MASSIVE amount of global cooperation that just doesn’t seem possible. From heads of every country right down to your local medical professionals and politicians. I just don’t see that as being a viable plan. I think they just refuse to admit that, even as advanced as we are, we couldn’t stop the virus. That only requires people to trust that they know best, which is a lot more likely than a huge conspiracy.

Do I have a decision maker?

 

[wtburnette]

So buckwacker doesn't have am answer either.

My questions are usually tough.

Throwing out questions that no one has answers to isn't tough, especially lately.

 

[rooster]

The war against medical choice continues locally

Woman suing Indianapolis hospital that refuses to give her mother ivermectin for COVID treatment

The lawsuit was filed in Marion County Circuit Court by a daughter whose mother is hospitalized at Ascension St. Vincent on 86th Street in Indianapolis.

www.wthr.com

 

[jsharmon7]

Do I have a decision maker?

I’m not sure what you’re asking.

 

[wtburnette]

The war against medical choice continues locally

Woman suing Indianapolis hospital that refuses to give her mother ivermectin for COVID treatment

The lawsuit was filed in Marion County Circuit Court by a daughter whose mother is hospitalized at Ascension St. Vincent on 86th Street in Indianapolis.

www.wthr.com

from the article:

“Therefore, they are taking a hardline, a correct hardline, to say we do not believe this will benefit you. We believe it may harm you and therefore we are perhaps compassionately saying no."

Lying sack of . Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the market. There is very little, if any chance that it will do harm. At most it won't help with the treatment, but there is no real reason to not administer it. Except politics.

 

[foszoe]

So you're saying you never have answers?

I don't find your questions that tough.

No.

I am saying I don't typically ask a question when I know the answer.

 

[foszoe]

Throwing out questions that no one has answers to isn't tough, especially lately.

There are several here who seem to know the answer to lots more questions than I do.

 

[jsharmon7]

from the article:



Lying sack of . Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the market. There is very little, if any chance that it will do harm. At most it won't help with the treatment, but there is no real reason to not administer it. Except politics.

The part that stood out to me was the argument about the court being put in the position to say they know better than the hospital. Well, that’s not really accurate. The court is deciding whether a person should be given a medication they want, and was prescribed by another doctor, over the objections of the hospital. This isn’t a doctor saying someone is being a kook and they’re professionally obligated to overrule them for their own good. It’s a doctor disagreeing with another doctor. It WAS prescribed, but they’re refusing to honor it.