UAW On Strike

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • firecadet613

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    40   0   1
    Dec 24, 2012
    3,304
    113
    73e51548fcff7b75822f9810e7059bc6.jpg
     

    sadclownwp

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 97.8%
    45   1   0
    Jan 6, 2010
    6,219
    113
    NWI
    For a statement to be true shouldn't it always be true?
    Nothing could be further from the truth. For instance some truths are situational. Take the sky for instance. On a sunny summer afternoon, if someone asked if the sky were blue, it would be true. However 9 hours later if you were say say the sky is blue, it would be false, because the sky would be black or whatever the reasonable similar color would be.
     

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    17,614
    113
    For a statement to be true it should be stated in a way that it is always true. So if one states that something is not true, then any instance of it being true fails the test. So GFGT is right to ask him “always?”
    Where do you account for the original post in your statement?

    I say the sky is blue.

    You observe a red sky and say my statement is not true.

    A 3rd party says "always" to the second statement and a 4th party claims the 3rd party is correct while ignoring that its a response to the first.

    You are applying the truth test to the wrong statement
     
    Top Bottom