Turkey really shoots down a Mig today

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,343
    149
    PR-WLAF
    "The American side, which leads the coalition that Turkey belongs to, knew about the location and time of our planes' flights, and we were hit exactly there and at that time,"

    So let's see here. Vlad's boys (who are not really coordinating anything with us) fly their cold-war era fighter-bomber (a ripped off FB-111, we came out with that in the 60s and retired that fleet in the early 90s) without fighter cover into Turkish airspace (they are kind of bad with the whole coordination thing too), get their dumb asses smoked and this is our fault??
    Putin says US knew flight path of Russian bomber shot down by Turkey | Fox News


    He's just seeing if he can get Barry to apologize, or blame it on global warming (affected Russian navigation systems, doncha know?).

    Then Barry will draw another fuchsia line he can later abandon.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Yeah, the full context of that is a bit different, though. The Turkish prime minister said something, in a half-hearted defense, that the Turkish authorities did not know it was a Russian plane. That was a mistake.

    It is implausible to think that Turkey did not know it was an Su-24. Now, whether it was a Russian or Syrian plane might be in doubt. But, given the prevalence of Russian air activities in the area, that would've been a safe bet.

    However, by saying they didn't know, he implied that if they HAD known, then maybe they would not have shot. That allowed Putin to mock the assertion with righteous indignation. Putin's statements about the identity of the aircraft included that it was properly "marked" as a Russian aircraft (presumably the roundels and such). The obvious problem with that is that the days of visual range dogfights are basically gone. The aircraft was shot down from at least 10 miles away, and maybe closer to 20. (That's based solely on a TLAR* view of the radar plots.) It is unlikely the pilots had any sort of visual identification of the Su-24.

    *TLAR = That Looks About Right
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    A bit more table-pounding:
    Turkey warns Russia not to 'play with fire' over downed jet - BBC News
    On Thursday, Turkey's President Erdogan seemed to offer an olive branch to Moscow when he told France 24 TV: "If we had known it was a Russian plane, maybe we would have warned it differently." On Friday, he accused Moscow of "playing with fire" and "lying".

    Did he change his rhetoric dramatically in less than 24 hours? Hardly. The first message was delivered to a Western audience, the second, to a domestic.
    ...
    In a televised speech, Mr Erdogan warned Russia it was "playing with fire to attack the Syrian opposition, who have international legitimacy, under the pretext of fighting against Daesh".

    Putin wants an apology from Turkey before any meeting. That's effectively like saying there will be no meeting.

    Both sides are painting themselves into corners.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    Learn something new every day. I didn't realize that there was such a thing as a pod for the C/D. What I did realize is that not equipping the F4 with a gun in the first place was nothing short of someone's d**k measuring fantasy regarding the awesomeness of an 'all missile' fighter for the first time with no regard given to using the right tool for the right job.

    At the time, military thinking was that "dogfighting" was a thing of the past, especially with the speeds at which combat jets were flying. Turned out they were wrong.
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,218
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    Perhaps, but we can't ignore the fact that this amounts to a dispute between a chihuahua (Erdogan) backed up by a jellyfish (Obama) and an alligator (Putin).

    I'm not so sure you're right about this. Some analysts seem to think Putin is in a fairly weak position, economy-wise and that, while he's playing his hand masterfully (against dunces and militarily weak - or just weak-minded - opponents) he really can't afford to spread his military resources too far. Hence the limited deployment of Spetznaz and aerial assets to Syria. If he decides to get frisky with Turkey, he may be able to get something done, but it will likely cost him more than he's willing to pay.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    I'm not so sure you're right about this. Some analysts seem to think Putin is in a fairly weak position, economy-wise and that, while he's playing his hand masterfully (against dunces and militarily weak - or just weak-minded - opponents) he really can't afford to spread his military resources too far. Hence the limited deployment of Spetznaz and aerial assets to Syria. If he decides to get frisky with Turkey, he may be able to get something done, but it will likely cost him more than he's willing to pay.

    As far as the personalities go, I have no doubt. As for paying the cost, it is possible that Putin really can't comfortably afford the resources, believes it can be done economically, or has outside backing (perhaps some covert Chinese participation) while standing as the front man. With him, you never know, as opposed to the Kenyan who just makes you stand there shaking your head at his ineptitude.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Learn something new every day. I didn't realize that there was such a thing as a pod for the C/D. What I did realize is that not equipping the F4 with a gun in the first place was nothing short of someone's d**k measuring fantasy regarding the awesomeness of an 'all missile' fighter for the first time with no regard given to using the right tool for the right job.

    View attachment 43216
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    It looks cool, but it was the textbook definition of "spray and pray".

    Awesome pic, was that at a museum?


    Yep. All restored and pretty and it is on a C-model I believe.


    ETA: Nope, I'm wrong. Its at Pima Air & Space museum in Tuscon and the display inside the museum is an E-model
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    26,342
    150
    Avon
    Yep. All restored and pretty and it is on a C-model I believe.


    ETA: Nope, I'm wrong. Its at Pima Air & Space museum in Tuscon and the display inside the museum is an E-model

    The pretty made me think it was a museum. E-Models had the internal 20mm and had a 30mm gun pod. I remember an old Phantom pilot saying you'd be better off turning the gun pod around and using it for more thrust.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,555
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Its my understanding the gun pod attached on or near the centerline and it was the gunsight that was lacking. I have seen some old footage ( on wings over vietnam - miss that show ) of testing of a prototype pod that was wing mounted, which was a real cluster****
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Its my understanding the gun pod attached on or near the centerline and it was the gunsight that was lacking. I have seen some old footage ( on wings over vietnam - miss that show ) of testing of a prototype pod that was wing mounted, which was a real cluster****

    I could see how going from a wing mount to a centerline mount would add up to an upgrade from 'wild-ass guess' to 'scientific wild-ass guess'.
     

    Thor

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jan 18, 2014
    10,753
    113
    Could be anywhere
    Real and real big. As I pointed out earlier the downing of the Russian jet was an act of war, countries not at war don't shoot each other down for airspace violations. And likewise countries waging a war tend not to violate the airspace of other nations with armed aircraft. The closing of the Bosporus Straits is likewise an act of war...and the shelling of troops in Syria. https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/583

    Meanwhile our POTUS dithers in Paris about climate change. Well, folks, the climate she be changing and the rain and warming really are man made this time. The only question is going to be how big the storm.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Real and real big. As I pointed out earlier the downing of the Russian jet was an act of war, countries not at war don't shoot each other down for airspace violations. And likewise countries waging a war tend not to violate the airspace of other nations with armed aircraft. The closing of the Bosporus Straits is likewise an act of war...and the shelling of troops in Syria. https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/583

    Meanwhile our POTUS dithers in Paris about climate change. Well, folks, the climate she be changing and the rain and warming really are man made this time. The only question is going to be how big the storm.

    You fly a warplane over another nation's sovereign territory, you run the risk of it being shot down. Turkey was completely justified. Russia has been playing recklessly, and this time it was Turkey who did the stuffing. **** Russia.
     

    cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,343
    149
    PR-WLAF
    You fly a warplane over another nation's sovereign territory, you run the risk of it being shot down. Turkey was completely justified. Russia has been playing recklessly, and this time it was Turkey who did the stuffing. **** Russia.

    Famous last words of how many folks who have tangled with Russia.


    Let's see how NATO responds if the balloon really goes up. I mean, it's not like climate-change serious, and the 80's got their foreign policy back, so it's all cool.
     
    Top Bottom