trump

[BugI02]

View attachment 47703

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Ben Sasse:

PSA. Saying someone can't do a specific job because of his or her race is the literal definition of "racism."

In regards to Trump's comments about Judge Curiel

 

[T.Lex]

Ben Sasse:

In regards to Trump's comments about Judge Curiel

In fairness, that's not really what Trump said. He said the judge is doing a bad job because of his race, not that he can't do the job at all.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

In fairness, that's not really what Trump said. He said the judge is doing a bad job because of his race, not that he can't do the job at all.

Probably a little from column A, a little from column 2. Sasse definitely stretching a little.

Trump Calls Scolding by Newt Gingrich 'Inappropriate' - ABC News

Trump insisted that his comments about the judge came in defense against relentless questions from reporters and others about lawsuits against Trump University. Trump said U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel can't be impartial in the suits because his parents were born in Mexico and Trump wants to build a wall along the border.

 

[Ericpwp]

It has more to do with his connections to HRC and a group that helps illegal immigrants stay in this country. He should recuse himself.

 

[T.Lex]

It has more to do with his connections to HRC and a group that helps illegal immigrants stay in this country. He should recuse himself.

Neither of those things are the subject of the litigation, and would not be.

 

[Ericpwp]

and is why I don't think the judiciary should be a member of any political party.

 

[T.Lex]

and is why I don't think the judiciary should be a member of any political party.

Interesting. Probably worth a whole different thread, but I'm really curious how something like that would work.

Maybe a caste system or something.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Neither of those things are the subject of the litigation, and would not be.

Interesting. Probably worth a whole different thread, but I'm really curious how something like that would work.

Maybe a caste system or something.

That's one side of the issue. If you strictly limit yourself to the subject under consideration, how do you address concerns about a judge with a high probability of having a burr up his ass against one party for other reasons? Just because it isn't the issue under consideration, that still leaves open the possibility of judgment being rendered based on other considerations.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Florida AG asked Trump for donation before nixing fraud case

 

[IndyDave1776]

Pat Buchanan's thoughts...

The Donald & The La Raza Judge

 

[Route 45]

“Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.” - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

A Judges View of Judging Is on the Record - NYTimes.com

 

[Kutnupe14]

“Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.” - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

A Judges View of Judging Is on the Record - NYTimes.com

And you take that to mean that she's implying heritage would take precedence or rule of law, injecting bias into cases where one's origin has no significant bearing.... ie Trump University?

 

[Route 45]

And you take that to mean that she's implying heritage would take precedence or rule of law, injecting bias into cases where one's origin has no significant bearing.... ie Trump University?

Absolutely not. Judges never let bias affect their decisions. They are certainly all beyond reproach.

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life." - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

 

[IndyDave1776]

And you take that to mean that she's implying heritage would take precedence or rule of law, injecting bias into cases where one's origin has no significant bearing.... ie Trump University?

Would you want to go to court for any reason with a judge who is, say, a moderator on Stormfront? You really think you would get a fair shake even though it was about an unrelated issue?

 

[T.Lex]

That's one side of the issue. If you strictly limit yourself to the subject under consideration, how do you address concerns about a judge with a high probability of having a burr up his ass against one party for other reasons? Just because it isn't the issue under consideration, that still leaves open the possibility of judgment being rendered based on other considerations.

“Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” she said, for jurists who are women and nonwhite, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.” - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

A Judges View of Judging Is on the Record - NYTimes.com

Absolutely not. Judges never let bias affect their decisions. They are certainly all beyond reproach.

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life." - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

Would you want to go to court for any reason with a judge who is, say, a moderator on Stormfront? You really think you would get a fair shake even though it was about an unrelated issue?

Well, first, this judge's nation of origin is 'Murrica. He is not Mexican. He is American. Or does INGO now adopt [heritage]-American as the norm?

Perhaps I missed it, but what what has this judge done to somehow equivocate with being "moderator on Stormfront?" Let's keep a sense of balance, eh?

This is more akin to a second generation Irish being judge in a case regarding... patents. With one of the litigants being Catholic and the other Protestant.

Moreover, what about the appellate court that AGREED with the trial judge? They are all Latino racists, too?

Or maybe, just MAYBE, this judge made the right decisions? Is that so hard to allow?

 

[Ericpwp]

San Jose Police Chief Who Admits ALLOWING ATTACKS on Trump Supporters is Affiliated With La Raza

Which ?La Raza?? Trump comments cause confusion over group's role | Reuters

 

[printcraft]

San Jose Police Chief Who Admits ALLOWING ATTACKS on Trump Supporters is Affiliated With La Raza

Which ?La Raza?? Trump comments cause confusion over group's role | Reuters

But but but he's a professional and professionals NEVER EVAR let their personal biases interfere with their professional duties.
Honest Injun!

 

[Kutnupe14]

Absolutely not. Judges never let bias affect their decisions. They are certainly all beyond reproach.

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life." - Justice Sonia Sotomayor, United States Supreme Court

Ah.... so Muslims probably should be allowed Sharia law courts ' eh?

 

[Route 45]

Ah.... so Muslims probably should be allowed Sharia law courts ' eh?

Yes, the logical conclusion of realizing that some judges may allow bias to color their decision, because of their background, means that we should let religious groups have their own system of laws.