Hey! You're reading too much common sense into that. What she really means is that if a person that has spoken ill of Latinos comes into her courtroom, they will be ruled against, regardless of what the facts say! Dagnabit!
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
trump
- Thread starter badboy2
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
Hey! You're reading too much common sense into that. What she really means is that if a person that has spoken ill of Latinos comes into her courtroom, they will be ruled against, regardless of what the facts say! Dagnabit!
If it's even a possibility she shouldn't be a judge. A klan member shouldn't be a judge or a senator.
It's a black and white question. (no pun intended)
indiucky
Grandmaster
BTW, is there any sense of irony in using old quotes to support current position, while ignoring disavowals and clarifications from the utterer.
If there is I ain't smart enough to recognize it....
Exactly. What, again, would be the basis for recusal in the Trump U case? The judge's decisions have (apparently) been affirmed every time.
BTW, in a quick google, before becoming a judge, Curiel was a prosecutor tasked with pursuing major felony and narcotics trafficking cases... from Mexico. He was even targeted for assassination by at least 1 cartel.
In this specific case, he moved the trial date to after the election so as not to make it a controversy. That is something he was not legally required to do, but that could be understood to be doing Trump a favor.
Not much evidence of prejudice.
Voters get to decide.
Sometimes in a matter of hours.
indiucky
Grandmaster
I absolutely agree with you. No one who wants to live under Sharia law should be residents or citizens of the United States. Plenty of modern, first-world countries with Sharia law as the national standard for them to choose from.
Always glad to find common ground!
BTW, is there any sense of irony in using old quotes to support current position, while ignoring disavowals and clarifications from the utterer.
You mean like #NeverRelevants using Trump quotes from 2000 (AWB) but 'ignoring disavowals and clarifications from the utterer'? How utterly unsportsmanlike
But I thought it was an article of faith among some that liberal judge appointees rule in favor of liberal causes because of their liberalness. Does this not belie any assumption of impartiality? Why even worry about who Godzillary will appoint to SCOTUS, then.
I'm following you so far...
Wait what. Bias and race can definitely be mutually exclusive things... A person can definitely be biased against many things... but I'm sure there are people that really don't care about race, and would therefore be, "nonracist"
indiucky
Grandmaster
An honest man you are Kut.....
Otherwise the quotes would have served no purpose. I have no idea if the earlier rulings were bad, just that they were against Trump. At that point in time, Donald was still on record as criticizing Romney for being too tough on immigration.
Oh Ya?
Well, I am not prejudice in any way but yet, I believe a 100 foot electrified fence should be built on all our borders plus I'm voting for Trump.
Stick that in your racist hat.
There is nothing racist about protecting the country we live in.
Oh Ya?
Well, I am not prejudice in any way but yet, I believe a 100 foot electrified fence should be built on all our borders plus I'm voting for Trump.
Stick that in your racist hat.
What makes you believe that "I" don't want a fence put up? And exactly how is that racist?.... and I have a border plan that's way better and less expensive.
- Status
