trump

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    So you're saying I should have used a different word to rhyme than "camel"?

    This isn't about a rhyming dictionary.

    This is about safety. And greatness. And funny sounding names. Unfortunately, you've only got 1 out of 3.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    I pronounced Foszoe as "FOE-zoe"

    And T. Remember that Foszoe's religion is primarily practiced in the Middle East and Eastern Europe! Double Secret Scrutiny.

    And Jamil rhymes with Camel, and camels are found in the middle east! Let me get my latex glove...

    #logic

    And I'm not saying anything bad about the middle east. They love INGO in the middle east. Everyone tells me that.

    I'm just saying that until we know the real reasons these people are here on INGO, we just need to be careful. When I say "careful" I mean to build a wall to keep them out until we know why they want to post here. And can be sure they aren't up to something.

    There are plenty of decent people with funny sounding names. Some of INGO's best friends have funny sounding names (Glock, Ruger, Browning). It isn't the names we should have a problem with, it is the people who have the names that could be the problem.

    #logic
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    I voted for Mr Obama.

    Well it was in the primary because I didn't want Hillary to be the D candidate, but don't tell anybody.

    I once stopped at a body shop in a wide spot in the road in southern Illinois some time after Obama was in office. It was run by an amiable older fellow who liked to restore old cars, which led to an interesting conversation. We briefly turned to politics and he said that while he voted R in the general election he had crossed over in the primary and further explained: "I said at the time that I would vote for the devil before I would vote for Hillary Clinton, and I believe I did."
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Why punch down? Why not attack the candidate? Why waste time on her surrogates?

    It's as though he doesn't care. Outside of calling her a "crook" in his tweets, I've yet to see a strong anti-Clinton movement from Trump.

    Donald Trump calls Hallie Jackson to say this on Elizabeth Warren: "She's a racist...we call her Pocahontas for a reason."
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Why punch down? Why not attack the candidate? Why waste time on her surrogates?

    Because the surrogate fits his narrative. We need a wall. To keep America for Americans. Not people who claim to be Indians.

    Because more walls would've kept the Indians out.

    It doesn't have to make sense. Otherness is the enemy.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,179
    149
    Valparaiso
    Because the surrogate fits his narrative. We need a wall. To keep America for Americans. Not people who claim to be Indians.

    Because more walls would've kept the Indians out.

    It doesn't have to make sense. Otherness is the enemy.

    Well it stands to reason that if you enclose and area with a wall and start with no Indians in it and gradually expand the wall, you can keep the Indians out....until you need cheap cigarettes or a casino.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Well it stands to reason that if you enclose and area with a wall and start with no Indians in it and gradually expand the wall, you can keep the Indians out....until you need cheap cigarettes or a casino.

    Using that logic applied to Mexicans, I'd want to live outside the wall too.

    Kut (loves Mexican street food)
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,557
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Since this is a Trump thread, I have to tell you that both names sound foreign, so your backgrounds must be scrutinized before further posting will be allowed.

    Oh, and research has revealed that foszorelli guy has a strange religion. Not saying he might be a terrorist, but we'll just have to figure it out.

    :)


    That T.Lex guy sounds like he may have unchecked apex predator privilege (and maybe stubby forearms)
     

    JNG

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Mar 23, 2009
    260
    18
    So this most recent Supreme Court decision on abortion is a perfect opportunity for Trump to release a clear, strong, intelligent, principled statement explaining his pro-life beliefs and how the Court's blind hostility to all laws that affect abortion in any way is inconsistent with the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments, and with the State of Texas's sovereign general powers protected by the Tenth.

    Or it would have been, if he were pro-life or if he had any familiarity with or genuine concern for the Constitution.

    Come to think of it, I suppose his silence isn't surprising. I imagine he'll speak out eventually, probably with some of that trademarked double-speak that lets all of his supporters hear what they want to hear, no matter where they stand on the issue.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    So this most recent Supreme Court decision on abortion is a perfect opportunity for Trump to release a clear, strong, intelligent, principled statement explaining his pro-life beliefs and how the Court's blind hostility to all laws that affect abortion in any way is inconsistent with the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments, and with the State of Texas's sovereign general powers protected by the Tenth.

    Or it would have been, if he were pro-life or if he had any familiarity with or genuine concern for the Constitution.

    Come to think of it, I suppose his silence isn't surprising. I imagine he'll speak out eventually, probably with some of that trademarked double-speak that lets all of his supporters hear what they want to hear, no matter where they stand on the issue.

    He's had more to say today about the insignificant Elizabeth Warren than any of the SCOTUS decisions.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom